0
23

[–] Acerphoon 0 points 23 points (+23|-0) ago 

Making a bad joke. Ok. Making two bad jokes also okay. Maybe even with child pornography being part of your joke.

But who the fuck is this obsessed with "child porn jokes" that you can find atleast a dozen tweets about it?

0
8

[–] Zaqwert 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Completely agree. If it were one offhand joke you could more easily ignore it. But in Gunn's case it was clearly some sort of sick fixation.

0
6

[–] IndigoElectric 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Seth Macfarlane.

Love his work but I always thought he made a lot of jokes about pedophilia.

Watch FG you'll see a lot jokes about Peter Griffin liking child porn.

Three I can think of off the bat:

  1. There's an episode where Peter opens an art exhibit and it's his private collection of "Baby Weiners".

  2. There is an episode where (I think) Peter's computer gets stolen. He then says "oh some of the photos I save on there I just had, as, you know, a joke.... I'm going to jail..."

  3. There is another one recently where God tells him point blank that he knows Peter loves child pornography.

At work so I can't provide the clips but I can if necessary. I always thought it was a little odd.

1
5

[–] truthwoke33 1 point 5 points (+6|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Seth is a Jew so...

Fun fact: In Jewish "culture" it's perfectly normal to crack jokes about shitting, incest and baby rape. I'm serious. They are just a sick people.

0
2

[–] Gorillion 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Seth M is deep in for sure. Nobody gets the career and big money deals he has without being fully in. They've hidden his jew ancestry pretty good. His mother's side IINM. Maiden name is interpretable as being non-Jewish, but after some digging I found that there were quite a number of different spellings, some of which are identifyably jewish*.

Not to mention that he was (((lucky))) enough to miss that plane flight on 9/11.

*https://voat.co/v/news/2646050/13378725 this poster got it. Sager/Sagar etc.

0
0

[–] Ashra ago 

AND he posted "100 prepub3scent girls touching themselves" video? Just... NO.

4
11

[–] Braulio237 4 points 11 points (+15|-4) ago 

Shapiro is a neocon, formerly known as a Marxist.

0
7

[–] no-hurry-no-pause 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Shapiro is a neocon, formerly known as a Marxist.

Shapiro is a neocon, formerly known as a Marxist primarily a Jew.

James Gunn is a Jew.

All the other attributes, whether correct or wrong, are insignificant compared to jewish tribal allegiance.

Similar to the case catholic kiddiefuckers protecting each other against prosecution for decades, the weight of a child rape pales in comparison to turning in a brother to the enemy.

Imagine living in Zimbabwe or South Africa as one of the last whites. Would you ever side with the rabid niggers against a white brother, even if he did things to niggers for which you would execute him by your own hand if comitted against a white in a white country? Thats essentially how jews must feel living surrounded by hundreds of millions of goyim. Theyd rather let their fellow jews regularly rape and dismember and eat thousands of screaming goyim babies than rat them out to the hated goyim and watch them prosecute them.

[–] [deleted] 1 point 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] NoisyCricket ago 

Judeo-Marxist = Marxist

0
1

[–] Waiyu_Dudat 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Trotskyist, specifically, but largely the same thing yeah.

1
-1

[–] Tzitzimitl 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

bolshevik

1
7

[–] Adminstrater 1 point 7 points (+8|-1) ago 

If Ted Cruz gets his wish and James Gunn is investigated, it would certainly make the liberals implode on themselves if it just happened that James Gunn isn't as innocent as his claim the jokes are.

0
6

[–] crustyjuggler 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Takes libertarian stance on unrestrained freedom of speech, gets labeled as a hypocritical looser by a virtue signaling author. Frankly fellas, we go down that rabbit hole, and we're no better than the antifa wanting censorship 'cause my fee-fee's are hurt. I don't care how sick and twisted a political opponent's speech is, they have the right to say it. Whether he deserves to keep his job is another matter entirely.

1
2

[–] qotile 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

I don't care about the jokes at all, but Gunn 100% vocally supported the politically-motivated firings and Twitter bannings of other people (like Roseanne Barr) and he deserves to drink his own poison. So did (((Benji))) actually iirc, his only steadfast principle is what's good for his tribe.

0
1

[–] IndigoElectric 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I think you're right to a certain degree. There is certainly an argument to be made that he shouldn't have been fired.

The main problem I have in this instance though is that Shapiro is being a major hypocrite. I watch his podcast, and he was stating constantly that Roseanne should have been fired and that she was a "crazy person".

His argument was that her comments could possibly drive viewers away from the network as they could be interpreted as racist. Yet he states that we shouldn't call for the firing of someone even more influential for saying things that are even more reprehensible than what Bar said.

Really disappointing on Shapiro's part. He isn't applying his principles equally.

0
0

[–] crustyjuggler ago 

Thanks for the update. You've summed up why this is an issue better than the article's author. I haven't really watched much of his stuff lately. I've been hooked on stefan molyneux's channel.

0
5

[–] generate 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

fuck thegatewaypundit.com

Error 1009 Ray ID: 43ffb1bd7d288f9f • 2018-07-25 15:35:04 UTC Access denied What happened? The owner of this website (www.thegatewaypundit.com) has banned the country or region your IP address is in (RU) from accessing this website.

0
0

[–] 13378904? ago 

It's almost like they have to comply with laws.

0
1

[–] generate 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

sharia laws?

0
3

[–] 13378932? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Fail to see how he "lost" anything. His position is in line with conservative and libertarian stances. He even says it's up to Disney to decide that and it might make sense due to him now working for a company that caters to families. His discussion on it even goes so far as to ask why Disney didn't do their own due diligence in advance before hiring him. His argument around not firing for old tweets etc is that we all have said something stupid online (though maybe/maybe not this vile) that could get us fired if someone dug it up. Especially if what is socially acceptable changes.

Ted Cruz is right on it too. If there is any reason to believe he did any of the vile things he Tweeted he should be investigated and prosecuted.

0
1

[–] Master_Foo 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Fail to see how he "lost" anything. His position is in line with conservative and libertarian stances.

He "lost" because he argued from a conservative/libertarian stance. The people claiming victory are coming from an Authoritarian Right and a key position of any Authoritarian (left or right) is that you NEVER play Devil's Advocate for the "other side".

Ben Shapiro is a Liberal Conservative (No, I didn't mess up there). Even if the Alt-Right is Conservative, they are Authoritarian Conservative. So, Ben Shapiro is going to be declared the loser no matter what.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] NakedWarrior 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

A lot of corporations have moral clauses in their contracts, which Gunn's tweets would've likely broken. However, we are talking about Disney, pedo capitol of the world even if normies don't know it.

0
0

[–] MadBro ago 

Yea.... But they should probably keep an eye on the kids in his neighborhood

0
1

[–] QuickMafs 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Guardians of the Galaxy 2 was pretty overrated

load more comments ▼ (6 remaining)