0
22

[–] Jeckle 0 points 22 points (+22|-0) ago 

He won't be assaulting anyone else now that he's been goodified.

13
-8

0
10

[–] Goathole 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

It's like, you watch it five times on five different articles and it just keeps getting better.

[–] [deleted] 9 points 10 points (+19|-9) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
19

[–] Pwning4Ever 0 points 19 points (+19|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Gun owner confronts a woman in the passenger seat over a parking space. -1

Telling someone that they're shit humans for parking in handicap is reasonable. Mainstream America thinks you are a douche bag for parking in handicap spots.

0
5

[–] SuperConductiveRabbi 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

The parent poster is referring to the sticky legal situation where if someone is judged to be "initially provoking" the confrontation, they can't claim self defense. However, I think in this case the confrontation was the assailant shoving the victim. It's not illegal or a provocation to tell someone they can't park in a handicapped spot.

In Florida this clause was recently a big deal with Martin vs. Zimmerman. They claimed that Zimmerman provoked the confrontation by following Martin (who was cutting through lawns, allegedly slinking around suspiciously, and allegedly looking into windows). However the cops/judge/jury determined that Zimmerman wasn't doing anything illegal and wasn't provoking a confrontation by following Martin and reporting his suspicious behavior to the police.

1
16

[–] Goathole 1 points 16 points (+17|-1) ago  (edited ago)

You're kind of right but you're not. This would have all been avoided if two other things had happened instead.

  • 1 . if the entitled sheboon hadn't parked in a handicrapped spot.

  • 2 . if the alpha nigger kept his nigger hands to himself and his emotions in check

4
1

[–] chirogonemd 4 points 1 points (+5|-4) ago 

He was wrong to shoot. Just brandishing his gun was a threat of lethal force and the black guy noticeably backed off. There was a large delay where the white guy decided to shoot after seeing the black guy create distance.

He was wrong. Nigger or not, somebody doesn't deserve to die for a shove.

If you think that you are stupid.

2
0

[–] SuperConductiveRabbi 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

The guy parked in the spot, the woman was the passenger

3
15

[–] Tallest_Skil 3 points 15 points (+18|-3) ago 

Nonwhites have no business in white nations.

2
14

[–] blackwithhiv 2 points 14 points (+16|-2) ago 

Fuck your armchair quarterbacking. The nigger threw the man to the ground then kept pulling at his waist band. Totally justified shooting. Assailant had the means, the proximity, and the intent to do gross bodily harm. Now go apologize to your wife's boyfriend for being such a cuck.

[–] [deleted] 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

[–] [deleted] 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
5

[–] MistaMusick 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Jacobs, who was a certified nursing assistant, said she is seeking legal representation to challenge the “stand your ground” law and hold Drejka ACCOUNTABLE for his actions. “He’s getting out like he’s a police officer or something, and he’s approaching me,” she said. “I minded my own business… I didn’t do anything wrong.” This is the problem right here. Attempting to deflect responsibility for her nigger mates chimpout and poor parking. I didn't do anything wrong. Niggress yes you did. Your BF did something wrong twice. If he had done the right thing and parked elsewhere and/or came to speak with the dude civilly, he'd still be alive. Good riddance.

3
-3

[–] bagano1 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago 

At most, she was taking up a handicapped parking spot at a convenience store in the hood. Hardly felony murder. It doesn't warrant a confrontation that will start World War III. But Drejka has a habit of doing this. He should go to jail for murder.

0
6

[–] performance 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

One less cockroach on the streets.

0
6

[–] rockemsockemroblox 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Goddang nogs just can't contain themselves.

1
5

[–] CrustyBeaver52 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

Clear case of self defense during a physical assault.

2
2

[–] chirogonemd 2 points 2 points (+4|-2) ago 

Bullshit. So you should be able to shoot someone for pushing you? Even after they are backing away?

Fuck your wild west shit.

So if there was a nog harassing your girlfriend and you shoved him, he should have the right to shoot you in the chest?

You should be thinking of precedent setting here.

0
4

[–] NACHTJAGD 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

You have no right to touch another human without their consent... when will you get this to your thick fucking skull? This is literally how the law was written in common law. Now touching and committing acts of violence are two different things, there's even a difference between incidental and intentional touching. But the victims bodily integrity takes precedent over that of the attacker. The law was written in such a extreme case that unwanted touching, to groping are criminal acts.

Unwanted touching falls under harassment, when the touching becomes of a sexual nature then it falls under sexual abuse laws.

Secondly read up what 'menacing behavior' means in the law and 'fear of life'. The nigger had a shouting match with the victim after the gun as pulled, perhaps even spitted at him, the video quality is shit to make it out.

Fully justified.

1
1

[–] CrustyBeaver52 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

LOL - yes, it's assault and battery - and the push could have killed him.

It was a physical attack, and using any force in self defense is fully justified.

If someone attacks you you can then repel the attack by any means available. That is the law. Open and shut.

I believe the precedent is already set and is quite clear.

1
0

[–] bagano1 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

And you wonder why I don't like the pro-gun fuck nuts on here? They do themselves no favors. Most of them are spineless, small men who can only hide behind their guns to feel strong.

3
-1

[–] bagano1 3 points -1 points (+2|-3) ago 

If the pusher kept attacking but it was nothing but a cheap shove and he wasn't willing to commit to anything more. The guy backed up and then he shot him. Clear case of murder. It's not like he was even being hammered or anything. It was a "back the fuck off bitch" shove.

1
-1

[–] CrustyBeaver52 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

It is impossible for us to say.

We cannot say if the attack was over or not.

We cannot say what was being said or expressed at the time.

We cannot know the state of mind of the gun owner - if he was stunned or disoriented, or in fear of his life.

We can say he was attacked, by surprise, and he defended himself, and it is completely legal for him to do so.

The moral of this story is do not attack people.

0
4

[–] Kingleopold2 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

He's robbing liquor stores in heaven now

load more comments ▼ (19 remaining)