[–] Dr_Shekel_Nigger 0 points 19 points (+19|-0) ago  (edited ago)

If we are going to be “logical” and “fair”, then we should admit that African genetic distribution favors athletic abilities, especially in running. If humans on the whole can admit that there are in fact differences in genetics between “races”, i.e., taxonomic groups/sub-species, as there obviously is, then of course some of those genes affect behavior too. And where there is a strength, there also must be a weakness. So admitting African athletic performance as a strength of their genetic distribution, it is therefor implied and logical that there is a weakness somewhere else. Admitting that your genetic competitor has a strength doesn’t hurt your debate position, and in this case as with many others, it actually strengthens your position. Why? Because getting libtards to admit that black genetic distribution is different is the first step towards the discussion about genetic differences that affect behavior, and is the first step towards an examination of the distribution of behaviors in Africans. And once that examination can begin in earnest in our society...

[–] truthwoke33 0 points 18 points (+18|-0) ago 

White men can't jump, but they can build society.

[–] Tzitzimitl 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

white men cant jump, but they can fly

[–] Dr_Shekel_Nigger 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Exactly

[–] voatuser1128 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Zulu warriors could run 20 miles a day barefooted and then fight a battle but the Zulus didn't build roads or libraries or aqueducts or bridges.

[–] Inconceivable2 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Zulu warrior, carrying only a loin cloth and a spear to chuck.

Compare to Roman Legion which marched 10 (or more) miles per day in full armor, shield and weaponry... and then kicked ass when they arrived.

[–] johnjohn 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

So East African genetics definitely seems to apply to long distance running (Kenya) but the vast majority of the greatest black athletes come from selective engineering via the Western slave trade and Western Africa, so it's hard to say it's the African genetics or just a result of selective breeding for peak physical traits as being the primary determinant. I venture to say if you were to pick the biggest, strongest, and healthiest of Western European white people for 400 years and have them breed together you'd have a very similar effect on sports.

[–] Dr_Shekel_Nigger 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

possibly, but you're talking about utilizing artificial selection for 400 years. On top of that, being biggest, or strongest, won't help you run faster, typically. Relative running ability is more attributable to the efficiency of the heart and lungs, as well as proportions of the limbs and a host of other factors. So the strongest and biggest might actually fair far worse in running. And what would happen if during that same period, you went to the highest point in Kenya and took the black athletes with the greatest efficiency of oxygen use, and utilized artificial selection on them for 400 years at the same time? My bet would be that they would perform better than the athletes you chose to implement artificial selection on for 400 years.

My point wasn't that you could start now, and then change a group's distribution of alleles, as you're arguing. My point is that there is ALREADY a different frequency of alleles, a different distribution of genetics, for different groups, some of which is related to different athletic attributes, and some of which is related to behavior

[–] baphometsrage 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

If you want to take it one step further and short-circuit their brains at the same time, ask why, if they're so physically superior, were we still able to dominate and exploit them almost without resistance until we decided not to.

[–] Retron 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

[–] McFluffy 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

the France president has a step son older than him.

[–] dooob 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Top kek, they tried to use these photos against her (fake outrage), all it did was improve her approval rating. Kolinda is 2nd most popular politicians, 1st spot is literally nobody (no, fo real, nobody has been rated the 1st politician in the last few polls that they had).

Not to be all optimistic about Kolinda, she sometimes emits weird signals. For examples, she obviously likes Trump but at the same time she is buddy buddy with Macron (altough Trump does the same, friends close enemies closer n shieet). Unlike US president, Croatian's president's power is really low. I know she can criticize politics out public and recommend topics needed to discuss in the parliament. Both are powers that are extremely rarely used by any president, at least the way they should be used. Kolinda, on the other hand, used her powers to call out the demographic problem (Croatian's massivly leaving the country, realistic numbers are less then 4mil population, over half a mil in germany only) and recommended an investigation in a Hotmail scandal (basically the Croatian's Hillary email scandal but with hotmail accounts) but they deemed she didnt break the law even though she obviously did). I half-forgive her for not going full Trump because, believe it or not, Deep State is more ruthless in Europe then in US, specially since they took 100% of media control. I can go on and on about her because I have been closely following her for a while now and I wouldnt be interested in politics at all if it wasnt for Trump and Americans who voted for him. Good bless you.

[–] Inconceivable2 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Khaled Beydoun, who teaches at UC Berkeley, tweeted:

Dear France,

Congratulations on winning the #WorldCup.

80% of your team is African, cut out the racism and xenophobia.

50% of your team are Muslims, cut out the Islamophobia.

Africans and Muslims delivered you a second World Cup, now deliver them justice.

— Khaled Beydoun (@KhaledBeydoun) July 15, 2018

Julia Ioffe, a correspondent with GQ magazine, wrote:

This #WorldCup has been clear evidence that immigration has changed the “culture” of Europe—for the better.

— Julia Ioffe (@juliaioffe) July 14, 2018

Sabrina Siddiqui, a reporter for the Guardian, tweeted:

Sixteen of the 23 players on France’s team come from families that recently immigrated to the country, most of them from Africa. Seven players are Muslim. A testament to how immigrants enrich a country’s culture.

— Sabrina Siddiqui (@SabrinaSiddiqui) July 15, 2018

Ok then...

Why hasn't an African team won the fucking world cup every fucking time ???

[–] Schreiber 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Maybe because most are busy nogging instead of practicing soccer?

The ones in Europe are taught by their white masters to fucking do something productive instead of chimping all day. Hard work/being productive is not part of the nigger culture.

[–] dooob 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Africans are poor people, meaning you can go, find a fast player and promise him glory and fame with you connections and he accepts to sign a crazy contract.

[–] superbhub12 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I admit the beautiful game displayed by the Croatia Football Club. There passion for winning game has been great. But my friend in football goal count for winner. So France are lucky team to win World Cup 2018. So that is that France are World Champion 2018

[–] larryhuston 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

You suck monkey dick

[–] voats4goats 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

That and diving for penalties and having the referees call fouls blatantly in your favor when it shouldn't have helps too..

[–] Joe_McCarthy 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Silly article title. Questions of the appropriate demographic composition of a country has nothing to do with winning a soccer match. France won.

[–] Antiseptic 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

How can France win if there were no French people on their team?

[–] Joe_McCarthy 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

France has no team unless Frenchmen are on it. Tr00th.

[–] Saufsoldat 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

More importantly, it didn't score its goals by taking obvious dives and benefiting from the ref's incompetence.

[–] Pissed_Off_Vet 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

And they’re overwhelmingly White!

[–] vladtep 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

All animals are more athletic than people and less intelligent.

Yet they're not citizens, they don't have any rights, no one thinks they are better and gives a horse a million dollars and a white girl for winning a horse race.

If you want to watch spooks play basketball, you can just make them do it and not give them shit just like you always do to the horse.

Fascinating...lol

load more comments ▼ (6 remaining)