You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
some judges and legal analysts argued that campaign promises should be off-limits, or at least dwarfed by government actions that are not overtly discriminatory.
Correct. If the court is allowed to use rhetoric to interfere with dialectic, then we will have a very dysfunctional government.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] logos_ethos 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Correct. If the court is allowed to use rhetoric to interfere with dialectic, then we will have a very dysfunctional government.
[–] 2cents4free ago
Sotamoyer makes a valid point yet it seems they recalibrated appropriately.