11
128

[–] Tallest_Skil 11 points 128 points (+139|-11) ago 

NOT CITIZENS. NO RIGHTS.

It’s pretty fucking simple. No trial, no protections. You came here to commit genocide on Americans and steal from us. You have absolutely no expectation of security. You are a foreign invasion force. You’re lucky we don’t shoot you all on sight.

0
33

[–] fuck_reddits_feefees 0 points 33 points (+33|-0) ago 

Right? I remember when Trump was campaigning he called for a halt on all Muslim immigration and the lefties and the cuckservatives were triggered screeching "but the first amendment!". Doesn't work for non citizens pal.

2
2

[–] Pwning4Ever 2 points 2 points (+4|-2) ago 

It'll be va bigbscotus case. Does the Constitution protect the people or the people on the land.

Personally I think it should be both. As much as I want illegals out

1
16

[–] glassuser 1 points 16 points (+17|-1) ago 

No, that's not true. They have rights. They have the right to not be murdered, mutilated, subjected to cruel treatment, subjected to torture, the right to be required to provide no information but their name, rank, and identifying number. They have a right to basic holding quarters and daily food ration and water to keep them in good health. They have these rights because the united states willingly signed a treaty which compels us to respect those rights of prisoners of war.

1
4

[–] Gorillion 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago  (edited ago)

I understand your angle. Them being PoWs when detained.

But do you mean the Geneva Convention? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Geneva_Convention
That's not as water tight as you indicate. The Patriot Act and relabeling prisoners as "illegal combatants" has offered some workarounds that the World at large hasn't seemed too keen to challenge.

This is a stealth army. Human Beings being used as biological weapons. Aggressive breeding populations, used to change the demographic make-up of their targeted nations. The Geneva Convention was not set up for this sort of warfare.
Except in this: Biological Warfare is also banned by the Geneva Convention.
Are these people or weapons? They're certainly being used as weapons.

Sovereignty is a supposed "right" too. Where does that start and end, versus the individual rights of would-be human weapons?

2
3

[–] kingminos 2 points 3 points (+5|-2) ago 

Terrosts have not the rights of solders. That's why you butcher them out ruthlessly ... men/women/children doe-eye babaz ... stack the bleeding bodies high enough that none can climb over.

0
1

[–] stradian 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The Geneva Conventions do not recognize any lawful status for combatants in conflicts not involving two or more nation states. A state in such a conflict is legally bound only to observe Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions and may ignore all of the other Articles.

Surprise. Unless we go to war with Mexico, there is no treaty standing in our way. They still have no rights. They are covered under article 3. However, they are still criminals in the process of committing a crime.

4
1

[–] Tallest_Skil 4 points 1 points (+5|-4) ago 

They have a right to basic holding quarters and daily food ration and water to keep them in good health.

Not if they’re deported the day they’re caught! Or just shot, since they’re foreign combatants.

They have these rights because the united states willingly signed a treaty

“International law” doesn’t exist.

rights of prisoners of war.

So just don’t take prisoners.

1
11

[–] Goat-Master-5000 1 points 11 points (+12|-1) ago 

What you wrote here is actually the best breakdown of what's happening.

Illegals are a foreign invasion force, and this invasion must be repelled.

1
3

[–] ModernProblemSolver 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago  (edited ago)

I just made this account to applaud Trump for this.

Brings a tear to my eye.

Bravo, Mr. President, Bravo.

0
2

[–] Pawn 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

court case said that they have some rights, including potentially gun rights as well.

0
1

[–] thelma 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

They have the right to GTFO or die.

0
0

[–] kingminos 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Finance my enemies weapons? Are you one crazy pillpulling JuuB?? Shoot-down the traitorous judges so ruling.

0
46

[–] RoBatten 0 points 46 points (+46|-0) ago 

Trump did not differentiate between people who entered the United States to seek asylum and illegal immigrants.

You do not "enter" to seek asylum. You apply for asylum in one of our many consulates in your home country . . .

0
24

[–] TreblinkaRebuilt 0 points 24 points (+24|-0) ago 

The asylum bs needs to end completely.

0
11

[–] phillip 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

It went from illegal immigrant to undocumented immigrant to refugee and soon they’ll just call them “citizens”. These are foreigners committing crimes. Some misdemeanors many felonies.

0
3

[–] Workman 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Have you heard leftists talk? We're one of the most hateful, racist, xenophobic, islamophobic, misogynistic countries in the world! Clearly we're in no shape to take in asylum seekers until conditions drastically improve!

0
3

[–] irelandLost 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

That's not true. You apply for immigration visas in consulates, asylum is applied for at borders cos the whole claim is that you have been forced to flee in fear for your safety. Kinda hard to claim you're desperately fleeing life threatening danger when you're happy to turn up to a consulate and wait it out while your application is processed.

0
2

[–] Pepper-theDoctor 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

And since there are no land connected territories that have citizens eligible for asylum, we can just automatically deny everyone at the Mexican border

0
1

[–] Kannibal 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

You can also apply when you cross the border at a legal entry point.

This has been part of the situation

0
34

[–] thelma 0 points 34 points (+34|-0) ago 

I would vote for shooting them on sight.

0
25

[–] fuck_reddits_feefees 0 points 25 points (+25|-0) ago 

Israel has no problem doing that at their border

0
2

[–] benjitsu 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Like a lot of people, it would appear "borders" on a spectrum, but they really ought not to be.

0
1

[–] Lordbananafist 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Israel doesn't have borders

0
0

[–] TheGreatRoh 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

And it's anti-semetic to say otherwise.

0
0

[–] Elemental_Lightning 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I'm up for that!

0
26

[–] TheDarkForce 0 points 26 points (+26|-0) ago 

The incoming Mexican president literally called for an invasion into the US. He claims it is a human right for his people to live off our money. In war you do not have court cases. You act.

0
3

[–] ShinyVoater 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

incoming Mexican president

No, just the heir presumptive. The election hasn't happened just yet.

0
9

[–] Workman 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

election

Is that what the they call it in Mexico when they hand power to the last candidate standing who didn't get shot by the cartels?

0
22

[–] thelma 0 points 22 points (+22|-0) ago 

They can apply for asylum in our embassy offices in Mexico...they have zero right to come into the USA seeking asylum.

0
2

[–] glassuser 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I can think of a few situations where they might expect the privilege of requesting asylum at the border. Say they were kidnapped to be sold as sex slaves for the international elite in the US, and managed to escape just outside of the border. But let's be realistic here - they apply to just about zero cases.

0
1

[–] Carlosone 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Tough. Fight back.

0
18

[–] ratsmack 0 points 18 points (+18|-0) ago 

The vast majority of the invaders are "economic migrants" looking for the free handouts... you're retarded if you believe anything else, hence liberals.

0
2

[–] glassuser 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

True story.

0
14

[–] FuckYouReddit- 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

  1. Are they citizens? NO

  2. Are they in the country without permission? YES

Seems guilty to me. No need for a trial.

0
11

[–] benjitsu 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

If I blatantly ignored the laws of a country and the worst they did was throw me out I would be GRATEFUL AS HELL

0
2

[–] Captain_Faggot 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

There's no incentive to stop.

load more comments ▼ (40 remaining)