You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

1
1

[–] Mimar 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

In a heavy liberal area why would you want a Liberal Jury?? Fuck the Jury and just have the judge rule. You can hold the Judge to the fire if he gets political, or makes rulings based on opinion instead of facts. Now-a-days they push and want a jury since it means they can control what the jury sees, hears, and understands. Remove the jury and you remove the way the judge can manipulate the situation.

0
0

[–] juicedidwtc ago 

only the accused can waive the right to a jury tho

0
0

[–] Mimar ago 

Hi, I'm usually the one thats late to the party. The commentary I wrote was an advisory to those in that area. If you read the article, one would come off with the the belief that possibly Jury but for sure the public attending the trail were liberals. At the end of the Article it stated something about a kangaroo court, don't remember since its been a week. But my comment was to those who read it and went wtf was the judge thinking. Now majority of people if ever in court are defending themselves. So my comment was too them. About a way to stop it from happening too them. But yes you are correct only a Defendant accused of a criminal offense(usually) can waive that right. But I highly doubt we have many prosecutors on voat, just saying.