1
36

[–] Flour 1 points 36 points (+37|-1) ago 

Big win for Whites, both here in the states and globally. God bless Jarod Taylor.

0
21

[–] ardvarcus 0 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago 

It is a win for whites, but at the same time, it's a win for everyone of every race, because when whites win, everybody wins.

0
3

[–] gazillions 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Donations are tax deductible

https://www.amren.com

Or you can gift card donate if there's reasons you don't want your name attached.

0
0

[–] gentlemanadventurer 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Can we just have a victory without dragging the muds into it?

2
5

[–] armday2day 2 points 5 points (+7|-2) ago 

This isn't an explicitly race based issue.

1
21

[–] CheeseboogersGhost 1 points 21 points (+22|-1) ago 

Its humanity VS the jews

0
11

[–] Acerphoon 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

Since Jared Taylor and AmRen is basically running on a race realist platform. And being banned for talking about racial differences really only affects whites, it could be argued that it is, indeed, a win for white people on a race based issue.

Of course, in a broader frame it is about free speech on social media in general, but on this particular issue, it's a win for whites.

0
1

[–] this_is_my_4th_acct 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

The only reason he was banned was because he's a white man who advocates for white people

1
12

[–] Naught405 1 points 12 points (+13|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Anyone who wonders who should win in the eyes of the law and of court precedent, the key phrase here is <<public forum>> If you open a space to the public you cannot abridge their rights there even if the space is privately owned and administered. This includes things like stores that sell to the public, privately owned parks, factory towns etc, no rule they implement may abridge your rights.

This is the opposite side of the gay cake question - the bakery cannot ban gays or refuse to sell to gays, (but that doesn't mean gays can force the owner to make art supporting gayness.)

In order to have an exception you need something like an invite only membership that isn't open to public applications.

3
3

[–] 1HepCat 3 points 3 points (+6|-3) ago 

I'd rather have Twitter be free to discriminate arbitrarily and that give rise to alternatives like Gab and eventual commoditization than everyone continuing to focus all their attention on what's otherwise going to continue trending towards becoming a very government-friendly monolith.

0
3

[–] ProgNaziGator 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

If gab becomes big the jews will take over gab. It's what they do.

0
3

[–] Shekelstein6M 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

rise to alternatives like Gab

And what do you think would happen to Gab if it ever became bigger than Twitter? It would get bought out by kikes, and the cycle would repeat itself.

And anything they can't buy, they will sabotage. They would hire every single DDOS service on the planet if they had to.

0
3

[–] Naught405 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

If cheap instant mass global multi media bi directional communication isn't a big enough change to cause a reordering of the old powers I don't know what is. These things go in fits and starts but I'm sure that what exists now is not even how we will understand it in 25-50 years. Even two years ago the powers that be were pretty confident they were finally getting a handle on 'the internet.' lol.

Why is there only one network? Why do all devices report home? Who owns that network or its parts? Why? Why the fuck is there only one network?? Why are there no actually secure and separate channels? how long will this state last? Will satellites bring us multiple private and separate global networks accessible from anywhere? How much does it cost to lay fiber optic trunk lines? Maintain? Comp tech is hitting physical and technical limits, the next step is distribution (if not stronger, then more) could "the internet" support that? Is the internet inherently secure or inherently unsecured?

It's sad that even though many people can see these things unfolding, it still progresses at the pace it does. The authoritarian globalists still have a lot of power and influence even though it is waning and they are beginning to be exposed. They also own a lot of important stuff especially infrastructure. The opposition is disparate and unfocused without a clear and specific cause, so far they are just upset at the abuse and want that to stop.

I think we are in for a wild ride. And by wild I mean paradigm changing. People who saw the potential of computers and networking in the 80s and 90s and thought we would be over it by now will be proven correct if a bit premature.

1
10

[–] Paneedleribena22 1 points 10 points (+11|-1) ago 

Now we need the damage in billions.

Then we set

0
22

[–] Kyle_Rogers_2018 [S] 0 points 22 points (+22|-0) ago 

Amren is seeking legal fees and damages. The legal fees sought will be huge, because these are top lawyers. They are also arguing that Twitter committed a "conversion." They illegally destroyed something that had value. Based on Twitter's own metrics, the Amren account was worth a quarter million.

0
2

[–] Flour 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

So what happens if Twitter can’t discriminate?

0
1

[–] Alpha_Voat_Protecter 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Even just a damage in the millions (or even the high-thousands) will instantly bankrupt them, since they've gone on happily censoring and banning people FOR YEARS, and this is merely the first tiny droplet of a legal tsunami.

Thanks to this ruling (which didn't even need to go all the way to the Supreme Court of the US, instead stopping at a "Superior Court IN CALI-FUCKING-FORNIA, OF ALL PLACES", making it clear that they're not going to get any kind of salvation from this storm of their own making), we should quickly see Twitter, Facebook, Google, and all the other Silicon Valley "social media" companies quickly begin panicking and trying to make small settlements with the affected users before they realize the potential payout of a class-action lawsuit against these bastards.

1
7

[–] Shekelstein6M 1 points 7 points (+8|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Awesome. Maybe after all this they'll finally stop banning my redpill accounts.

The funny thing is, I always get banned for posting graphs. It's something about presenting "racist" data in an understandable way that triggers them.

0
1

[–] sbt2160p 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

What graphs in particular?

0
0

[–] Shekelstein6M 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

On race and jews.

5
7

[–] DeadFox 5 points 7 points (+12|-5) ago 

Yet AmRrn disinvites Paul Nehlan from speaking because he names the Jew.

0
6

[–] Koalemos_Grottesco 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago  (edited ago)

AmRen has always employed a careful, steady strategy and they have every right to do so. Nehlan wasn't disinvited because he names the Jew, he was disinvited because he became belligerent and uncouth. Plenty of other speakers have and will continue to speak at AmRen who address the JQ in more serious and measured fashions.

Not everyone has to adopt the same belligerent Little-esque approach, nor should they. You want multiple, distinct vectors working along Schelling points, which is why when groups like AmRen or IE are absolutely right to be choosy with who they associate with.

Elite pro-white European groups will never be filled with "kike" screaming, juvenile-meme posting, circus-act militants. There is a place for that, but it isn't among the more serious, long-term focused groups.

2
-2

[–] DeadFox 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

The elites have no need for us and we have no need for them. The future will be decided by the angry commoner, not the upset richman.

0
0

[–] TheDonaldTrump 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

That faggot doxxed Ricky Vaughn,and should be shunned by us all.

0
4

[–] Simonbelmont27 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Not getting tired of winning yet.

0
3

[–] rspix000 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Paypal can be sued by Julian Assange under the same theory.

0
4

[–] Kyle_Rogers_2018 [S] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Paypal can be sued by a shit load of people and believe me the lawsuits are in the works.

1
-1

[–] speedisavirus 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

That depends. Is PayPal a public forum? That's what this is about. That Twitter claims it's a public forum then directly abridged rights afforded by the constitution.

0
2

[–] AutisticLicense 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Fucking huge. Nice post :)

load more comments ▼ (14 remaining)