You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
30

[–] AndrewBlazeIt 0 points 30 points (+30|-0) ago 

Oh so now it only cost $400m to make?

Ghostbusters 2016 cost $500m, but they expect us to believe a film with MORE CGI, that had to reshoot like 70% of the movie, which had an EVEN BIGGER MARKETING BUDGET only cost 'em $400m?

Can you say 'damage control'?

0
6

[–] Ifaptocomments 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

They started damage control back in like December basically warning investors that this movie would flop.

0
2

[–] selpai 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

True, but it's delicious to watch it flop. Plus, they didn't need to dig their hole deeper.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] InternetUser 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Why do they make films they know will tank?

0
1

[–] firex726 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Thats production budget... No ones talking about marketing which is exptes to add another 50% since they were late to the party.

0
0

[–] GuyIDisagreeWith 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Spent most of that on acting lessons.