You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] [deleted] 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 



[–] Ban_Circumcision [S] 4 points -4 points (+0|-4) ago  (edited ago)

LOL, yeah Im totally a shill. How is posting documented facts that tesla kill people? And their a shitty company going bankrupt?... Alsoliving off our tax dollars which is stupid.

You're the shill for downvoting this and not offering any argument of substance.

God forbid, I call someone out for ONLY talking about Islam and NEVER mentioning the Jews who conspire to let them into my country. Especially when they have said, they are Jewish, they go to Israel, they wear Mossad shirts, yeah... not suspicious at all...


[–] Ban_Circumcision [S] 5 points -5 points (+0|-5) ago 

"The outpouring of indignance of the vertically challenged, Zionist-lobby-funded Lutonian is in ignorance at what the ramifications are for the little girls who were the victims of the Muslim rape trial, which was still ongoing. The so called heroic act of Tommy Robinson has put the entire trial at risk of collapsing and the bastards walking free, laughing up their sleeves. Far from some heroic, brave act, persecuted by police, this is stupidity in the extreme, and this entire sorry saga has brought genuine nationalists into disrepute. If Robinson does not possess one lonely brain cell, to do what any other nationalist would do, i.e. when deciding to film the defendants arriving at court, first approach the court office to check whether the verdict was due Friday, or whether it was still ongoing, which would then make his live streaming a criminal offence, then don’t go sobbing that it’s all so unfair. Tommy, can you hear me?

Reporting restrictions, especially live streaming in an ongoing trial, are not there for nothing. If some amateur with a camera films defendants arriving at court in an ongoing case, streams their faces live on social media before the day’s proceedings have even started, and then adds his own perception that they are all guilty before a verdict has been reached, along with his own opinions, this can sway public opinion, along with that of the jurors, should they see it. That means, even if it has no effect on the decision of the Jury, those on trial can call a mistrial based on the claim that the premature footage did, can, or will, bias the Jury. In other words, Tommy Robinson put the trial in danger of the defendants being able to claim a mistrial due to public opinion having been swayed, and get off scot free, even if they were as guilty as hell."

[–] [deleted] 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago