You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
if he was arrested for disturbing the peace there must have been disruption or some commotion to which he can exclusively be attributed the blame for ,if this is not proven he has merely been arrested for either loitering (which is unlikely in a public space ) or breaching a restraining order( unsure of any outstanding) or as the judiciary says he was influencing public opinion which may have affected the court hearing .how could they have decided that he was breaking ANY laws until the moment the police intervened?
he is not guilty of reporting the crimes (alleged) that the accused have committed but guilty in that he used EMOTION to convey the message to the british people that their govt is not just responsible for letting these perpetrators into the country but will not allow the people to get a clear picture of who is committing these crimes .
any single person who can resonate with large numbers of citizens without the backing of govt channels is a danger to an AUTOCRACY and the govt must defend itself from a potential challegers lest it become a true democracy ruled by the peoples representatives for the good or the people .
view the rest of the comments →
[–] obama_sin_laden ago
if he was arrested for disturbing the peace there must have been disruption or some commotion to which he can exclusively be attributed the blame for ,if this is not proven he has merely been arrested for either loitering (which is unlikely in a public space ) or breaching a restraining order( unsure of any outstanding) or as the judiciary says he was influencing public opinion which may have affected the court hearing .how could they have decided that he was breaking ANY laws until the moment the police intervened?
he is not guilty of reporting the crimes (alleged) that the accused have committed but guilty in that he used EMOTION to convey the message to the british people that their govt is not just responsible for letting these perpetrators into the country but will not allow the people to get a clear picture of who is committing these crimes .
any single person who can resonate with large numbers of citizens without the backing of govt channels is a danger to an AUTOCRACY and the govt must defend itself from a potential challegers lest it become a true democracy ruled by the peoples representatives for the good or the people .