3
70

[–] SmokeyMeadow 3 points 70 points (+73|-3) ago 

"My parents were really upset," Martella said. "They both work for the federal government. My mom wanted to take further action. I’m kind of contemplating that. I talked to my mom about going to Indiana’s ACLU. I don’t know if that’s the right path to take. There's really nothing I need out of the situation. It’s my fear for others.”

What a piece of shit. I hope this fag and his lover both die of AIDS. They ruined a man's life because he wouldn't let them get nasty in his cab. The only "lyft" these two homos need is from a noose.

[–] [deleted] 1 points 32 points (+33|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

0
16

[–] Tacomelt 0 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago 

A simple "no public displays of affection" policy would be a sufficient defense and he could counter sue for the bad publicity and emotional distress their news coverage and follow up.

0
13

[–] Sublimesati 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Counter sue is the way to go. He should claim their P.D.A. lip smacking was very loud and distracting and made safe driving difficult. He terminated the ride when he no longer felt he could drive safely. Counter sue Lyft for making a driver operate in a dangerous driving situation. Sue the fags for new upholstery etc etc

0
14

[–] Mr_Wolf 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

I've heard if enough nasty going on in cabs amd we only have their side of things. They very well could have tried getting their nasty on and the driver didnt want their shit all over his car.

Passenger cameras will be next

0
3

[–] BordelonLoop 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

that's the version the driver will have to air.

0
2

[–] gazillions 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Another Indianapolis Lyft driver ready to dump a shitty Lyft jobs needs to set up that situation where he has to kick out a horny hetero couple with no social media ties to him. They can complain and keep records of Lyft's response.

1
11

[–] obvious-throwaway- 1 points 11 points (+12|-1) ago 

Why is Twatter, Kikebook and the rest allowed to discriminate at will? Why are some businesses allowed to discriminate but not others?

[–] [deleted] 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] assert_patrimony 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

It's the grounds of discrimination and the area of discrimination, and these very by jurisdiction.

In my jurisdiction, it is illegal to discriminate on the grounds of: age, family status, physical disability, religion, ancestry, gender identity or expression, place of origin, sex, colour, marital status, political belief, sexual orientation, criminal conviction, mental disability, race, or source of income. And those grounds must follow under the areas of: accommodation, service, or facility, purchase of property, employment, tenancy, employment advertisement, unions and associations, publication, and wages.

It gets more fucked up when you start looking at the specific statutes. Why did I bold the grounds of political discrimination and the area of employment? Because according to statute, it's only discrimination on the grounds of political belief if it's under the area of employment. So that means if I didn't get the job because of my political beliefs, I can file a human rights complaint; but if Facebook denies me their service because of my political beliefs, it's not discrimination and there's nothing I can do.

0
21

[–] Dontpanic 0 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago 

No mention of the drivers race. How curious.

0
16

[–] green_man 0 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago 

More importantly, religion.

0
22

[–] Jay_Mac 0 points 22 points (+22|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Who cares. He should have the right to choose who he does business with. For any reason. We call it freedom of association.

0
8

[–] Maroonsaint 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

That’s a guarantee that he’s not a white christian

1
18

[–] Acerphoon 1 points 18 points (+19|-1) ago 

Leave the driver the fuck alone, you sick degenerate faggots.

0
9

[–] WORF_MOTORBOATS_TROI 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The driver quotes and the way the paper bends over backwards to avoid describe him in any way makes it obvious he is muslim.

That said, these two fags are drama queens. You got kicked out of a cab big fucking deal.

0
9

[–] Xax 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago  (edited ago)

All he has to do is say he’s Muslim. That’s the perfect defense now.

1
1

[–] CognitiveDissident5 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

Or a Jew.

0
3

[–] toobaditworks 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Or gay.

0
7

[–] MyNameIsMud 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

He should have driven off a cliff and jumped out of the moving car at the last possible second to save himself.

0
6

[–] 12809417 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Hello is that the police? There's been a terrible accident -- two faggots just carjacked me and went off a cliff.

0
1

[–] weezkitty 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

There is a decent chance he's a sandnigger. So as far as I am concerned, they can all go off the cliff with no loss to society.

0
7

[–] Inaminit 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Get the fuck outa my car.

0
5

[–] timemage2 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

thats bullshit. gay or not you can be kicked out for kissing. driver fucked up probably and said it was cuz they were fags. shoulda just said he was a prude or rape victim.

load more comments ▼ (25 remaining)