Archived BREAKING: DARPA Admits 5G Designed To Slowly Kill Population (youtube.com)
submitted ago by Mogumbo
Posted by: Mogumbo
Posting time: 2.7 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 7/3/2018 10:00:00 AM
Views: 81
SCP: 2
6 upvotes, 4 downvotes (60% upvoted it)
Archived BREAKING: DARPA Admits 5G Designed To Slowly Kill Population (youtube.com)
submitted ago by Mogumbo
view the rest of the comments →
[–] Morbo ago
I mentioned the inverse square law so I definitely know how radiant energy falls off over distance. If you knew ANYTHING about reading you would have caught that. Also you are assuming that RF/EMF radiation is extremely dangerous at low energies. Only if you put yourself into the standing wave inside your microwave oven will any of your cited examples harm you. The low output of cell phones and Wi-Fi aren't any concern.
[–] HAESisalie ago (edited ago)
You are the one assuming it is dangerous at low energies or doses (the sun), while pretending that much higher energies or dosages are not harmful at all. Do yourself a favor and buy a EMF detector before you start talking on the subject like some expert, and see for yourself what gives off EMF and at what dosage. You would then know how ignorant your claim that only inside the microwave exposes you to EMF energy, or that you are exposed to much more just from being outside in the sun..
[–] Morbo ago
I have plenty of electronic test equipment that can measure RF/EMF output and tell me the frequency, relative power and even point me to the general direction of the source. I know plenty about RF/EMF and I do know what will radiate it and what won't. My microwave oven example said "harm you" which means it has enough energy output caught as a standing wave to cause the water molecules in your body to resonate and produce heat by friction. The difference between the sun as an output and man-made RF/EMF sources is the volume of space the sun's output covers. The inverse square law still applies, however, the sun's output is less like a point source and more like an infinite number of point sources aimed at the disc of the Earth exposed to it. The fall-off is minuscule at scales of meters or even kilometers. You would need enough distance between measurement points such that the curve of the Earth provides enough additional distance to have another order of magnitude of drop-off in power. The sun's light will be equally bright on a spot of an open field on a cloudless day as it will 100 meters down the same field. This is a good thing or else solar farms would be really fucking useless. The EMF energy from the sun would match the same fall-off as the visible light so you have a much broader area of field strength with no discernible fall-off over distance on the surface of the planet unless you use areas over hundreds of kilometers. If Alex Jones' claim of low energy EMF being able to kill humans, well then the sun would have already done that from the near constant exposure. You're ignorance and arrogance is showing here. Perhaps you should stop drinking the water. It might be turning you gay and stupid.