1
6

[–] CheeseboogersGhost 1 point 6 points (+7|-1) ago 

Time to expel the jews again

0
5

[–] Guy_Justsome 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Time to nationalize monopolies.

0
3

[–] aLegoInYourShoe 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Good luck keeping that secret for any longer period of time.

0
2

[–] aria_taint 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Cuckerburg is paying for selling data that help Trump and further helped sink the evil cunt. Obama did the same thing in 2012 with the same exact data from Fagbook and was hailed a strategic genius.

0
1

[–] Adrint 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Gee, I wonder what political leanings the suppressed media outlets all could have.

0
1

[–] WhoFramedReaderRabit 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

It's simple, Facebook suppresses any new outlet that doesn't follow the (((globalist))) agenda.

[–] [deleted] 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

1
1

[–] DickTracy 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Your sentiment is fundamentally wrong. In America, we value freedom of speech, it's kind of the basis for our system of government. The problem is that Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter have no problem selling advertising campaigns to these websites, and even help them gauge the effectiveness, and create the content. They are not telling them they are hiding the ads automatically with algorithms, and in lots of cases like that of Stephen Crowder, are automatically banning the content they helped to create over loosely defined rules that they keep changing, and refuse to explain. None of the content violates any US laws. These "alt-media" outlets, as you put it, have the right to build up their brand image/following using the same tools everyone else does. Surely you see the problem with the precedent that this sets.

[–] [deleted] ago 

[Deleted]

9
-9