0
56

[–] northportage 0 points 56 points (+56|-0) ago 

Shit like this is why I stand my ground and provide arguments, when I'm told that it's a ridiculous idea that leftists are progressing toward genocide. They are incrementally being conditioned to accept a 21st century horror show, and they're too goddamn self righteous to realize it.

0
50

[–] SebuttYopick 0 points 50 points (+50|-0) ago 

But the tv said Hobbits, Elves and Whites were the bad guy? # NotAllOrcs https://imgoat.com/uploads/8f13708210/19944.jpg

0
9

[–] badruns 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

This is my favorite meme of the modern era, barely edging out Ugandan knuckles

1
8

[–] 12220532 1 points 8 points (+9|-1) ago 

that picture rofl.

0
17

[–] PedoHunter12 0 points 17 points (+17|-0) ago 

It's because they're being programmed. Partisan bias (or "party-whipped) is a modern tragedy. The whole two party system is a big ruse, used to divide and pit the population against one another.

There are two "tribes" you are allowed to join, the one on the left or the one on the right. Most people never realize that both tribes are ruled by the same tribe leader.

0
2

[–] jeffwingersballs 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

just like last century

1
1

[–] WhiteSurvivalist 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

The first thing you need to compel to certain people relates to media, indoctrination and conformity.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gqYcQTpq_c&t=23 Illustrates media is a bunch of BS.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYIh4MkcfJA Illustrates the potency of conformity, combine the two and you can see how the media is an unimaginably powerful tool.

I am not sure if self righteous is the right term, though surely some degree of it applies, perhaps conformity is the first layer in this, though I don't know for certain. If you can inform someone if these traits, it may open them to other possibilities of truth, maybe.

1
23

[–] MoneyIsTiming 1 points 23 points (+24|-1) ago  (edited ago)

I was run off of reddit last week, brigaded, berated, and banned (same user name); because I meme'd about being afraid of Black Panther murdering me because I'm white, then did actual research to back up my fears of Black-Supremacists and kept finding raw evidence on YT of Black on White violence (with no W on B violence) and was inquiring on this issue, then that prompted a post about "Is it racist to feel racial prejudice if you're white"...then I made a satirical post about the final solution to white privilege is to euthanize the numerical same amount of Blacks who were enslaved in North America between 1600-2000, and in the text area pointed out the historically that large events that kill off humans (Black Plague) is very effective at equalizing socioecominc status: which got me banned from reddit.com

I am actually PTSD talking about these issues, because I feel I will be attacked, censored and banned.

After 8 hours of searching and reviewing YT: I currently have 56 anecdotes of B on W physical violence (raw video from YT), contrasted with 8 anecdotes of W on B physical violence where 2 of them are women spitting and 3 of them are White SJWs and Feminists attacking Black conservatives.

Edit: I cant post to subs yet, but here is the evidence I talked about:

B on W videos https://imgur.com/a/2ZXHv

W on B videos https://imgur.com/a/L0S6z

*note the last images in the album have dupes because the way it stops scrolling down...

2
13

[–] WhiteSurvivalist 2 points 13 points (+15|-2) ago 

Racism is a whitephobic term to take advantage of whites overly strong sense of empathy and to inhibit whites from doing what is best for white survival.

If they say 'it's racist to (insert anything relating to the objective of white survival)' call them whitephobic, tell them they are are pushing for white-genocide and they are oppressors and attackers of white precisely like what happened in zimbabwe and what is happening in south africa and everywhere else on Earth.

If they have rebuttle, just keep smashing them down with whitephobia.

0
7

[–] MoneyIsTiming 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

I recently realized this, "racism" = "anti-whitism". Whitephobia is a great way to describe this more succinctly.

0
2

[–] gazillions 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I'd rather smash them down with a stick because ultimately, violence wins.

0
11

[–] HAESisalie 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

I was shadow banned on YouTube comments for pointing out the actual murder rate based on race where the victim was a different race. It went against the narrative everyone else was pushing that blacks were still being murdered by whites in South Africa still, in one of those anti-apartheid videos from the 1980's.

Yes, all viewpoints but the chosen one, no matter how false it is, no matter what the facts are, only that viewpoint is allowed on Reddit or YouTube, Google etc. What they are doing is fascist and evil.

0
10

[–] OhRutherfordBehave 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

Welcome to voat dude.

0
5

[–] dontdoxxmefaggots 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago  (edited ago)

lol PTSD

you're only at the tip of the iceberg

your first red pill of many, and there are many

0
20

[–] IGiveZeroFucks 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago 

Helping victims of black supremacy is "ridiculously racist." What a time to be alive.

0
11

[–] karma_chameleon1776 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I love how her example of "more important" refugees just have to be Muslims. Maybe if she pointed to Christians and Yazidis being slaughtered by ISIS, I'd give her a bit more credit, but nope, it's gotta be Muslims. Muslims, Muslims, Muslims, if you don't prioritize a population known for holding some of the most toxic beliefs over everyone else on earth, you're a fucking bigot. Ugh, fuck these people.

0
11

[–] lexsird 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

We need to mark every fucking asshole who thinks that this is ok and that they deserve it. Mark them for the cull when the time comes. All Leftists must die.

0
1

[–] TheWorstImaginable 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Oh I definitely am. And just as important, find those who will be kicking down doors with you to secure your neighbourhood.

0
8

[–] Back-Again 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

A lot of the people they're mad at had nothing to do with apartheid, it ended 20+ years ago. There are adults who never even lived through it, supported it, etc.

I just don't understand why these alleged progressives won't let go of the past. Was apartheid bad? Yes. Is slaughtering people just because they're white okay? No, not even.

When I was in college our SJW professors used to tell us that it could be seen as racist to describe people as "black [job]." And that we should flip races to see if it was awkward or not. (Would you say "white cop" or "white doctor"? If not, don't say "black cop" or "Black doctor" either.)

If you flip the races in this scenario? All the leftists would be up in arms if it was about whites taking land from Blacks and acting out violently against them.

I guess it depends on if you think stealing and murder are wrong, period, or if they're only wrong for some people.

1
4

[–] ardvarcus 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

Was apartheid bad? Yes.

You need to open those eyes a little wider. Apartheid was not bad. It was a survival strategy, and now that it has failed, we see why it was necessary. It was either apartheid, or turn large numbers of blacks out of South Africa ... or kill them. The white South Africans chose the most humane option of those available to them, as white Christians usually do. Now they are being murdered by the very blacks to whom they showed compassion and mercy.

0
1

[–] DukeofAnarchy 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

They should have treated the blacks as dangerous wild animals and eradicated them. Giving them food and medicine and allowing to breed uncontrolled was not humane in the long-term, rational perspective.

1
-1

[–] gazillions 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Apartheid was reported on in the west as per their usual hysteria and reframing of events. Very few reporters went to South Africa and those that did talked to ranting blacks that wanted the nice house but didn't even want to work for it. Those blacks could have left. No one forced them to be there either, they didn't have anything to stay for other than wanting the nice house with no effort.

1
6

[–] Crikes 1 points 6 points (+7|-1) ago 

I've heard Molyneux, Peterson, Haier, Harris, and I'm forgetting someone..maybe Callen, all discuss how people with an IQ of ≤83 can't really function in a society. If this is the case, you can help a finite amount of dependents, like the ≤83 IQ people born in a society, but why on Earth would anyone think they could bring in ≤83 IQ dependents perpetually and help them, and not destroy their society? Why should they? It's not righteous, nor possible.

Take care of your own bedroom first, as JP says. Maybe a society does want to take care of the ≤83 IQ dependents already there, but don't encourage them to out reproduce anyone by the same rationale!

If you're going to allow someone in, they should benefit your society. An 85 IQ minimum would seem low. A 100 IQ would mean they could function with others, but again they're avg, so why would you (unless they bring some other benefit to the table)? A >100 IQ requirement makes sense to me.

By the way, the easiest way around all of this is to embrace freedom. To sell freedom. Then all you get is quality people trying to make it on their own. Those who survive succeeded. If you reject freedom, & want to have forced redistribution of wealth, then some min IQ requirement is in order.

There are plenty of brilliant people of all walks of life. You want them in your society. It's not about race. It's about independence, & an ability to assimilate into a community. Someone with 100IQ may try and fail, but someone with an ≤83 IQ cannot succeed.

Of course the reason no one does this is because our owners are using dysgenics to make better slaves. If somehow a nation would go their own way, have a min IQ req for immigrants, & parents. Incentivize the highest IQ to procreate.. it would easily become the most successful, desireable, place to live.

Until the owners invade to shut it down.

Again, either freedom & this happens organically, or forced redistribution of wealth, & further central planning. Freedom is by far the greater choice, but everyone seems to be rejecting it these days.

1
4

[–] ardvarcus 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

A >100 IQ requirement makes sense to me.

Immigration should improve the intelligence of our population, not degrade it. I agree, an IQ minimum requirement should be enforced for all immigrants, tests to be applied at point of entry. But it would do no good unless we controlled and stopped our illegal immigration, and put in prison those who are fostering it.

1
-1

[–] SomeDude64 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

No it doesn't matter if immigrants have 100+ IQ or not. It's accepted knowledge that Asians and Jews have higher IQ than whites yet their societies are still mostly worse compared to what white societies have been. There is more to race than just IQ. Europe isn't Europe without white people and people naturally act to promote their tribe when they aren't brainwashed into self hate. This in turn will lead to race conflict. Inviting a foreign race into a country is a classic divide and conquer tactic and is almost guaranteed to fail simply due to the fact that the foreigners do not have a heritage to tie them to the people and land. Research always shows that countries which are ethnically homogeneous are more united than those that are not. Regarding dysgenics I'm pretty much in agreement with Richard Lynn that democracies will never be able to seriously tackle the problem because it would be against the interest of a significant amount of the population and would raise concerns about ethics and morality.

1
5

[–] klngonwarr 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

Is it not funny how most of the racist are actually on the left and they are damn proud of it.

http://freebeacon.com/politics/dc-city-council-member-blames-snowfall-jews/

0
0

[–] Laurentius_the_pyro 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Democrats wuz da real raycists, sheeeeitt.

load more comments ▼ (16 remaining)