You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] Baconmon ago  (edited ago)

Then you don't know much about what MGM actually does..
Around 24,000 nerve endings in normal penis, only about 4,000 after circumcision..
Circumcision removes the MAIN part that causes you to orgasm (the ridged band, which is part of the foreskin).. The ridged band is completely amputated in circumcision.. This is why mutilated men have to use their hand to vigorously stroke their penis, while guys with a normal penis are instructed to use their thumb and 1 or 2 fingers to lightly move the ridged band up and down until they have orgasm, which by the way is, on average, much more powerful than some one that is circumcised.. The foreskin is not the candy wrapper, it IS the candy..

There is a lot more I could say, like the negative effects it has on womens' experience during sex compared to a normal intact penis, but I don't want to write here for hours, you get my point I hope.. Circumcision really is mutilation when you realize just how much it damages the penis.. It is one of the hardest and painfulest red pills for men that have been circumcised to take..

0
0

[–] ThisIsntMe123 ago  (edited ago)

"Much more powerful than someone who is circumcised" this can't be proven IMHO. It can be speculated by knowing how many nerves are removed and alike, but isn't knowable, as you can't do a double blind study or whatever. You can test the sensation a guy cut later in life feels, but theoretically if done as a baby, the brain can adapt. A guy cut later will feel a difference because he remembers the pain. The only way to test it is with identical twins, one cut one not, who've jacked off the exact same amount, and had the exact same sexualized experiences. You then hook them up to an MRI or whatever, and have a robot stimulate them exactly the same way. Then rate the results. Anything else is speculation in my opinion as it's not testable since pleasure is not comparable.

One question I would have though, wouldn't circumcision also be easier for condoms? Unless you get a special uncut condom, I'd imagine the physics of it either mean an uncut guy has condoms slip off, or most of the sensation lost as I don't think the sleeve can move that much with a condom without pushing it forward/off more.