0
0

[–] TheBuddha 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Your crazy ramblings aren't actually news. Maybe you can aim to put things in the appropriate subs?

0
0

[–] WhiteRonin 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

At least I write (opinion) or something when I ramble. Definitely should have gone in whatever.

0
0

[–] ParachuteAcuteAngel [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Maybe you should watch who you are talking to.

0
0

[–] TheBuddha 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Why? Are your pixels going to jump out of the screen and try to kick my ass?

0
0

[–] cyclops1771 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Te point of the Sam Neill character scaring the living bejeezus out of the fat kid was to demonstrate both his character's extreme DISlike of children (not LOVE of children) and his inability to interact with them in a "fatherly" way - caring, biological protective love.

Later, as the children are put in danger, his character grows and develops that innate biological protectiveness, and goes out of his way and puts his own safety on the line for the sake of these children, thereby making him a much more viable candidate for reproduction in the eyes of the Laura Dern character, who wants a brood of children of her own.

I did not see this as pedo in any way, but I was, at the time, disgusted by this, because this came out during the Hillary "It takes a village" crap and promotes single motherhood, as it was not the biological father (who isn't ever mentioned in the movie) who saves the kid, but strangers who take on that role, as if any man will do.