0
1

[–] canbot 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

SpaceX's mission was only to launch the fucker. If the satellite failed that is on someone else. This is clearly a hit piece by the anti SpaceX guys.

1
1

[–] hoak2017 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

Wallstreet journal and Bloomberg are mostly owned by SpaceX’s biggest competitors, Bezos and ULA bard members. That’s why they fail to mention the Northrup insisted on using and setting up it’s own payload adapter instead of the one SpaceX has used with no trouble.

0
1

[–] harddrive 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

It looks like it is separating in the pic to me

0
0

[–] pickled 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Space X is a huge waste of time and money.

1
0

[–] Oh_Well_ian 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

I posted this yesterday right after launch >> https://voat.co/v/news/2327030

MISSION WAS A FAIL / SECOND STAGE DID NOT FIRE

0
0

[–] derram 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

https://archive.fo/KMgCk :

Did SpaceX’s secret Zuma mission actually fail? - The Verge

'Because of the secretive nature of the mission, SpaceX did not show the entire Zuma mission during its livestream. '

'That’s certainly a mission failure, but it wouldn’t necessarily be the fault of the Falcon 9.“This is a classified mission. '

'But since Zuma is a classified mission, it seems doubtful we’ll get a straight answer. '

'We cannot comment on classified missions.”Of course, Northrop Grumman won’t comment on the launch. “This is a classified mission. '

'In its report, WSJ says that the Zuma satellite fell back to Earth because it didn’t separate from the upper part of the rocket. '


This has been an automated message.