0
4

[–] clamhurt_legbeard 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Awesome!

Obama never should have seized Utah's public land this way, and his protections for the Navajo are a joke, as his betrayals of the "guarantees" showed.

Good for all of us that Trump gave back the state land and will revamp the Dept of Interior to deal with this situation better.

0
1

[–] Alois_sticklgruber 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Doesnt agenda 2030 call for more land to be taken away? Turned into monuments, praire land, etc?

0
0

[–] zen_music 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I remember reading something a couple of years ago contending that the huge expansion of public land under Obama was to be used as secret mortgage value in borrowing money from China to prop up the US dollar. If this is rescinding that mortgage value, what collateral is China going to accept instead? You can bet they won't cancel the debt.

4
0

[–] SChalice 4 points 0 points (+4|-4) ago 

um, no, its about giving back to oil lobbyists money expenditures towards politicians

0
12

[–] undertheshills 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

Just because you dont like cheap oil doesnt mean the Federal government can railroad states and seize their land under national monument acts. The land goes back to the states. States get to decide how to use the land. Trump has 0 to do with what the state does after he gives back the lands.

0
0

[–] VelvetLurker69 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

But but but my chapped butthole! Until you can live your life free of petroleum based products(and I can tell you literally have no ideas how many there are)just shut your faggot kike nigger bitch mouth.

4
-3

[–] YouKnowItIKnowIt 4 points -3 points (+1|-4) ago 

Needs to introduce Net Neutrality for Cable TV

4
-4