0
16

[–] Men13 0 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Relevant: the 2010 case from Australia:

A gay couple wanted to adopt a kid, but child protection gave them hell and wouldn't let them adopt until a full investigation was completed to make sure they aren't pedophiles.

So a journalist decided to make a scene about it, writing an article about how homophobia was causing the child protection agency to prevent a kid from going to a good family, you know the drill. She (because of course it was a feminist she) went to interview the couple to show what good parents they are, and how safe the kid was with them, and made such a big stink about it that public outcry forced the child protection agency to stop their "homophobic investigation"

Later it was found out this couple used to rape the kid, and even pass him around at parties.

She (the journalist) tried to do some soul searching... But if course still claims the investigation was fueled by homophobia and no one could have known...

After her long soul searching, what did she find? In her own words (from the article she herself wrote about it):

http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2013-07-10/gorman-second-thoughts/4809582

About people being angry at her for helping them get the adoption:

And that's what the anger with me seems to come down to. Homophobia.

Right... Not that you pushed to stop an investigation into pedophiles because you wrongly thought it was stupid, destroying a kid's life. No. It's an irrational fear of gays that made people angry...

One of the real tragedies is that this abhorrent paedophilia has been linked to gay people. This current story is not a story about being gay. It's a story about two sexual predators who systematically abused their adopted son.

No, the real tragedy is that a kid got abused because you wanted to virtue signal. The real story is that if a straight couple was being investigated for pedophilia before adoption, you would rightfully agree it's a good idea. But a gay couple? You will do your best to stop it.

If I went back to June 2010 and I was faced with the same situation, would I do anything differently?

The answer is no, I wouldn't.

Fuck you lady. Fuck you.

0
0

[–] laserpewpewpewpew 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Where are vigilantes these days? Why aren't the right people murdered systematically yet??

0
0

[–] laserpewpewpewpew 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I am being facetious, I'm not asking for violence. The good people are always killed and hurt and the bad keeps growing and having no consequences.

0
2

[–] Curtainsclosed 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

If you told me 20 years ago that people would believe in many genders and that there will be kids books about being tranny boys, I'd have laughed. The whole snowflake scene would have been hard be believe, yet here we are. I hope the pedo movement doesn't doesn't become another mental illness normalised.

0
0

[–] clubberlang 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

They just opened Pandoras box the best is yet to come

0
2

[–] Cheesebooger 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

0
2

[–] GizaDog 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

1
2

[–] knightwarrior41 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

water is wet! duh

1
2

[–] Markb63 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

Gay is the gateway

0
1

[–] 0Cursed0 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Fuck dude in the EU they claim Islam and marry them, Dirty fucken cunts.

0
1

[–] senpaithatignoresyou 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

We need to be doing an IOWTB style campaign only with "most pedos are gay" and with good, verifiable stats on it.

0
1

[–] Oh_Well_ian [S] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

No.. We should put the laws back in place that made it illegal for gays to adopt children and public decency laws that make it illegal to expose yourself in public.

The studies are being conducted by Ivy league pedophiles and paid for by elite pedophiles.

load more comments ▼ (8 remaining)