You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
41

[–] pcguy2 0 points 41 points (+41|-0) ago 

What the fuck is happening in this country...

0
17

[–] chundernuts 0 points 17 points (+17|-0) ago 

A shit load of 'fearing for his life' it seems.

0
17

[–] Equizyme 0 points 17 points (+17|-0) ago 

This reminds of of the south park episode where they go hunting. "As long as you say 'its coming right for us', you can shoot it"

2
8

[–] Ouroboros 2 points 8 points (+10|-2) ago 

Seriously, this is the second time today I have seen The New York Post get treated as a reputable and credible news source.

0
4

[–] Duderonomy 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Ooh, upvoated for the salt.

0
1

[–] dreameater 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Technically that can be said about most of news sources. All of them are often so far on one side, its difficult to form your own opinion and even get the facts.

0
1

[–] 9-11 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

what did the national enquirer have to say about it?

0
4

[–] pcguy2 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Appropriate response as in turning a blind eye and putting this guy on "administrative leave"...

Nothing will change unless they stop protecting each other

1
1

[–] TalkingAnimal 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

I want to point out that putting someone on administrative leave is the appropriate first step. While they're on administrative leave you then investigate the issue and decide whether or not the complaint was valid, and either choose to terminate employment, require some degree of punishment as a condition of reinstatement, or reinstate the officer without conditions. Unfortunately, we often don't hear much after the initial reporting, so the leave is visible but firings aren't or conditions of reinstatement aren't.

0
1

[–] whatthehelldamnguy 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

A group of people have been given permission to break the law at will. This is what happens when that is allowed.