You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

20
-16

[–] Gamio 20 points -16 points (+4|-20) ago 

I'm not a fan of violence but to be honest I kinda support this. The whole point of having gun rights is so that the no would be law maker from on high can decide to fuck with you.

2
5

[–] BentAxel 2 points 5 points (+7|-2) ago 

Sorry, did you read the article. It's written so that it could be interpreted all guns that fire for each trigger pull is banned from being owned. So unless your weapon was designed pre 1840, it's illegal if they get their way.

0
0

[–] Gamio 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Did you hear something whip just by your head? That was the point I made so I'll restate it.

The reason firearm rights are baked into the United States is very simple, its so that when some prick from afar creates a law that fucks with people that those people can fuck the lawmakers back with just about the most effective equalizer ever made. It was to make sure that no repeat of what the British tried to do immediately before Americas open rebellion took place could happen again. If they go ahead with this "not a ban" ban on semi automatic firearms there will be effigies of lawmakers hung from lamp posts and more than a few people willing to use the now "illegal" firearms to make a point.

(yeah I'm aware its a bit of a romanticized and silly idea its just that a lot of political elites have basically became so detached from who they are governing that they could be stupid enough to make a scenario like this happen)

19
-17

[–] Lobotomy 19 points -17 points (+2|-19) ago 

To be frank, it should have happened decades ago.

0
4

[–] 10805363? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

You are a fucking call center whore.