[–] [deleted] 2 points 27 points (+29|-2) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
7

[–] monkeytennis 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

I wondered why Muslims would even want polygamy on such a side scale, but of course it makes sense. Trainloads of young, womanless men to export to infidel countries to begin the process of destabilisation / conversion. If every Muslim man had a woman his age to marry, they might risk settling down and getting a job.

0
3

[–] NigSlayer420 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Don't forget the inbreeding when converting the infidel fails.

0
4

[–] PhilaFerret 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I've never heard gays referred to as inefficient. I'll have to work this into a conversation today.

0
1

[–] IndigoElectric 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

This was brilliantly written. It also encapsulates my extreme aggravation when pseudo intellectuals used to say "slippery slope fallacy!" anytime anyone DARE say that this might be used as a springboard for legalizing other unorthodox unions.

Have an upvoat.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] Secret555 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Wow, thanks for opening up this fact to me. I could not understand the motivation and just assumed it was some taquiya bullshit to look progressive but actually it is exactly that with a little extra to further push their polygamous, pedophilic degeneracy a little further into our culture. Red pilled every day on this site.

1
12

[–] hardshaft 1 points 12 points (+13|-1) ago 

Praise Allah, the kuffars are giving us a database over which people to throw off buildings once we're done taking over Germanistan!

0
0

[–] Saufsoldat 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

They could already register and get all the benefits of married people, so that doesn't make any sense.

0
0

[–] hardshaft 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

AFAIK Germany keeps those databases on a state level, where as marriage within the church is kept on a federal level. It's easier to hunt down gays when they're all registered in one database over a shit ton of shitty maintained databases.

1
5

[–] AriesianGemini 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

Makes the gays easier to find when they are right there in the marriage registry.

Easier to find, easier to throw off buildings.

1
0

[–] Saufsoldat 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

They could already register and get all the benefits of married people.

0
3

[–] 10564428 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Vote ultra conservative at home, vote ultra liberal abroad

Anything that can preserve your side, anything that can subvert the other side

Pretty simple

...

Next sop, polygamy

1
0

[–] Schreiber 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago  (edited ago)

That is very very common actually.

An orthodox jew would vote conservative in israel, but vote liberal in white nations. A muzzie would vote conservative in their home nations, but vote liberal in white nations. A latino would vote conservative in their home nations, but vote liberal in white nations. A groid would vote conservative in their home nations, but vote liberal in white nations.

Why? If white lose a job, they get the job. If white lose a university spot, they get the spot. If white get a job, they can just laze around and live off welfare. If white has money, he can be mugged. If white girl is pretty, they can be raped. It's just so good to vote liberal in white nations because the idea of liberalism is for everyone to benefit on the expense of whites.

0
1

[–] 10567831 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Yeah, basically

Can't vote you up due to vote limit and no idea why you got voted down

2
3

[–] 22trilionAsecond 2 points 3 points (+5|-2) ago  (edited ago)

is gay marriage normal necessary and natural.

normal. No as I believe a child is better of with a mother and farther. the mother has a role as does the farther. But sadly most biological parents aren't the best people to raise their kids

natural. well at a 9% rate maybe yes it is natural. but I would need proof that there are monogamous homosexual animals that benefit the animals pack or group.

necessary. The only argument I have seen for this is that gays get depressed with out partners and to fight depredation they need to marry.

I believe that the prefect environment to raise a child involves their biological mother and farther each playing a role the other cannot. The argument against this is that a lot of biological parents are either choosing not to or incapable of providing the perfect environment to raise a child that would go on to become a productive member of sociality.

I do believe that children of gay partners struggle to assimilate in to sociality and become a productive member. there is a lot of evidence that boys need dads to prevent anti-scotial behaviour and girls needed dads to well keep their legs close.

maybe you can make a master race with artificial grown humans perpetrated by gay partners but It seems pointless.

I also think that you can change what you are attracted to. For instance if you masturbate to door knows for weeks you may become aroused by them with out first intending to masturbate to one.

see http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=if04g01 Ten Arguments From Social Science Against Same-Sex Marriage the FRC has some odd ideas about a lot of stuff but they might be on to something here

[–] [deleted] 2 points 1 points (+3|-2) ago 

[Deleted]

2
2

[–] 22trilionAsecond 2 points 2 points (+4|-2) ago 

exactly going with the idea that we are "born this way" would be to go against personal experience.

I think the same applies to things like CP, loli and the rest. If you notice your self going down that road you owe it to your self to make a change. Be aware of the consequences of your actions and be willing to make a change. You have to be stronger than your ego to both admit that you are wrong and make a change. Self hate its the first step to self improvement. Unconditional love does not lead to self improvement.

0
0

[–] Knote 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Lol you're an idiot, there's a difference between an association/cue trained into you versus a natural biological drive.

With that logic, hunger isn't natural, your body is just used to eating at the same time everyday thus you get hungry, so that means you can survive w/o food.

0
2

[–] aaronC 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Muslims get so much from liberals, they will concede some of their values to advance their goal. This sounds exactly like the non-muslim apologist definition of Taqqiya to me. Muslim MP's goal is to advance Sharia and Islam, they won't do that if they lose support of idiot liberals. They're playing politics, nothing more.

1
2

[–] valk2 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

Yeah, if the Germans aren't breeding then they can replace them faster....

0
0

[–] Saufsoldat 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Is there a single gay person in the world that became heterosexual because they couldn't marry...?

1
-1

[–] Sullysq 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

You miss the maths. Gay people can't breed so the populace that is breeding will replace the one that isn't in a generation.

1
1

[–] Markb63 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

They are pushing it to destabilize the society.

load more comments ▼ (14 remaining)