Archived Former Oversight Chairman Rips FBI Denying Requests on Hillary's Emails: Total Crap and Illegal (townhall.com)
submitted ago by Bad-R0nald
Posted by: Bad-R0nald
Posting time: 3.3 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 11/30/2017 10:00:00 AM
Views: 466
SCP: 86
86 upvotes, 0 downvotes (100% upvoted it)
Archived Former Oversight Chairman Rips FBI Denying Requests on Hillary's Emails: Total Crap and Illegal (townhall.com)
submitted ago by Bad-R0nald
Sort: Top
[–] lordvain2 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
This entire rebublic is HRC's bitch.
[–] Awful-Falafel 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Chaffetz has been bold lately. Within the past week he was saying that there is a lot more to the Imran Awan investigation too. I hope he doesn't get suicided.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
[–] onemealperday 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
ZOG
[–] RoBatten 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I don't think "the public isn't interested" is a valid reason to ignore a FOIA request. Judicial Watch has got this...
[–] Thisismyvoatusername ago
To be fair, while I happen to disagree with the FBI on releasing this information, I don't think their reason is that "the public isn't interested". When they say public interest, I believe they are suing public interest as a compound noun, not a noun verb combination. Whether the information being made public is in the public interest or not is independent of whether anyone in the public is interested in seeing the information.
[–] AnthraxAlex ago
Isn't a FOI specifically an indication of the public's interest?
[–] uvulectomy ago
I believe they're saying less "We don't think you'd be interested in this information." and more "Your self-appointed betters have decided that knowing this information would not be in your best interests. Now fuckoff and go back to staring at the idiot-box, plebs."