0
22

[–] novictim 0 points 22 points (+22|-0) ago 

The irony of this is astounding. First they came for the Armenians...and we know what happened next.

Lately they have come for the Stormfronters and I did nothing because i was not a neo-Nazi...

Rinse and repeat. We know what comes next.

0
13

[–] ardvarcus 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

Storm Front is a trial run, where the leftists test out their methods. We will see much more of this abuse.

0
0

[–] 10310638? 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

They know we're waking up.

We don't need to resort to draconian measures.

We're winning.

0
3

[–] freedomite 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

and I did nothing because I was not a neo-Nazi...

You may wish to reconsider that. After all, if google hates it it can't be all bad right?

0
3

[–] Subtenko 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

True, but I feel like you need a non-radical example for some people when explaining this. Because I can hear it already "THATS DIFFERENT, they are hatespeech!!!"

Maybe if blackpanther sites got taken down?.....who am I kidding

20
-20

0
15

[–] FreeBreivik [S] 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago 

0
1

[–] downtownchinatown 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

This is the Facebook account of the nigger who pushed for this:

https://www.facebook.com%2fcranberryred%3al7yrpuovbaoooxq6q0v5ifcjycw&cuid=662783/

Her name is Kirsten Clarke:

https://lawyerscommittee.org/staff/kristen-clarke/

0
10

[–] cdglow 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

2 questions.

1) In what ways are these lawyers alleging that Stormfront was "inciting violence"? To the best of my knowledge, though I never participated and only occasionally browsed there, the moderators did a pretty good job of keeping the site above-board and clean.

2) Why is Stormfront labeled as a "white supremacist" group? To the best of my knowledge, they labeled themselves as "white nationalists". When IQ and genetic related arguments came up, they admitted that the science indicated that East Asians had the highest overall IQs. I'm still not sure what is supremacist about that.

0
0

[–] idk 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

The Dodge Challenger guy was (supposedly - the group denies it) part of The National Vanguard. I don't know much about them, but it seems more White Supremacist than Neo-Nazi.

Anyway - now that I think about it, it seems really really strange that their website is still functioning while the Stormers are down.

1
9

[–] Samchay6 1 points 9 points (+10|-1) ago  (edited ago)

(((The Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law))), a D.C.-based nonprofit group, said it was behind the effort and had successfully booted the website from its domain of 22 years by raising its concerns with Stormfront’s registrar, Network Solutions LLC, and its parent company, Web.com.

(((Lawyers group)))

Source

0
4

[–] Bryntyr 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

"Civil rights under the law"

You mean like the first amendment? "NO GOY NOT DAT CIVIL RIGHT, DA OTHER ONE" the right to assemble? "NO GOY! YOU DENSE?" no clue then... "Da right of da jews to own goy slaves!"

0
0

[–] FreeBreivik [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Archive link: http://archive.is/zwZmV

0
8

[–] ardvarcus 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

How can the liberal fascists just arbitrarily take a group off the Internet? Why aren't there laws to prevent this deliberate, malicious persecution?

0
0

[–] critias 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

There are laws but they aren't enforced. The corporate state can choose what laws to enforce whenever they want. The body of laws is simply there to look good. Any form of big media, social or otherwise, is under corporate control and they all follow communist totalitarianism. So censorship is always going to be prevalent. They will always reward those who give to the state and love the state. In this case, the "limited state." If the constitution and bill of rights is to be upheld online, there needs to be a lawsuit and application of American law to the internet that falls within it. Otherwise, they will keep doing what they are doing. The law doesn't really mean much unless it's enforced. And a corruption of enforcement leads to ignorance of right and wrong. And youtube is a business. So there needs to be regulation of that business especially since they control what is viewed and absorbed by the public and pass it off as actual by choosing what is valid and what isn't. So they are basically like any of the MSM. Using legal loopholes to get out of being accountable to the public.

0
6

[–] placoid 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Stormfront crossed the line of permissible speech and incited and promoted violence.

That's for the courts to decide.

0
4

[–] 1Sorry_SOB 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

They'll be coming for Voat eventually. Stormfront was never that good. You'll find much better nationalist comment here.

0
1

[–] FreeBreivik [S] 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Well yeah that's why I'm here. When I first joined Stormfront, it was the only place on the Internet that was Jew-aware. I didn't even agree with most of what they were saying at the time, but they were the only game in town. You have to keep that in mind when you pass judgement.

0
3

[–] undertheshills 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Lawyer's Committee For Civil Rights did this.

131 Steuart St #400, San Francisco, CA 94105

(415) 543-9444

load more comments ▼ (10 remaining)