You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

2
-1

[–] novictim 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago  (edited ago)

I sure hope you are right but it does seem to fit. Would it surprise you if you found verification?

(Meaning: It may not be true...but it's true enough.)

0
2

[–] Master_Foo 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Would it surprise you if you found verification?

It would probably help if the source wasn't waaaaay the fuck down the rabbit hole, drinking gallons of cool-aid, like this source is. Is it possible Sweden is destroying artifacts? I suppose it could happen. But when the author then decides to detour into some BBC show something something We was Kangs. OK, what the fuck does that have to do with it?

This is what the boy who cried wolf sounded like.

1
0

[–] novictim 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago  (edited ago)

This is what the boy with arms and legs chewed off... who cried wolf sounded like.

I don't disagree that sourcing is important.
But, like Trump's "Last night in Sweden" comment, the truth is closer to the comment than the comment was false.