0
61

[–] lord_nougat 0 points 61 points (+61|-0) ago 

It's weird and wonderful these days when actual justice happens.

3
51

[–] MetalAegis 3 points 51 points (+54|-3) ago 

Doesn't make up for them executing a man who was surrendering.

0
47

[–] 10271308? 0 points 47 points (+47|-0) ago 

His name was Lavoy Finnicum

0
18

[–] weezkitty 0 points 18 points (+18|-0) ago 

No it does not. But at least we can do what is right for the survivors.

0
6

[–] MedicalMountainGoat 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The fucker who killed, in cold blood, him should be executed by being drawn and quartered.

1
6

[–] carlip 1 points 6 points (+7|-1) ago 

That didn't happen at this particular stand off.

0
3

[–] Ruffsecs 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I would agree but only if they would knock the KANGAROO COURT Bullshit OFF, What gives them the right to continue to retry them for something the jury didn't even agree on, BUNCH OF FUCKING FAHGOT Spineless prosecutors if you ask me.. MUH REPUTATION... It's a large part as to why our justice system is so fundamentally failing the people of this Country.

1
-1

[–] bob3333 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

So what exactly about stealing from the taxpayers is justice?

0
2

[–] ploice 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Found the shill.

0
2

[–] lord_nougat 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

So what exactly does that have to do with innocent men not being convicted by a jury of their peers?

2
-1

[–] HomerSimpson 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

Nevada courts are usually very fair. Especially to big named people.

[–] [deleted] 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

1
36

[–] heretolearn 1 points 36 points (+37|-1) ago 

more people need to learn about jury nullification.

1
14

[–] Little2934 1 points 14 points (+15|-1) ago 

Be careful there. You could be arrested for standing outside a court of law and handing out leaflets educating people about jury nullification.

5
-1

[–] HomerSimpson 5 points -1 points (+4|-5) ago 

No you can't. You can be arrested if it causes a conflict of interest(IE someone you know is on trial)

0
6

[–] prairie 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago  (edited ago)

But I've heard that you have to do what the judge says. I mean, why would they have a jury unless the point were for the judge to tell them what to think and how to vote? /s

0
10

[–] CarpetDime 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

You can't be prosecuted for serving on a jury and failing to vote to convict. Jury nullification arises out of this principle.

0
0

[–] TexasWelderGuy 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

AGREED!!!

0
0

[–] caniscanem 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

i read that people would not convict escaping slaves, would not use English common law and did not convict due to prejudice, I guess that means whites did not want to see others jailed for killing blacks

0
30

[–] burns29 0 points 30 points (+30|-0) ago 

This is why you have a right to a jury of your peers. When the law is unjust, the people provide justice.

0
7

[–] TheBuddha 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

More often than not, it is Just Us.

0
0

[–] BlueDrache 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

You misspelled (((Us)))

0
6

[–] MedicalMountainGoat 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Too bad most of my 'peers' out here are retards, niggers, and mexicans.

0
0

[–] idk 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

On the other hand, you're not called to jury duty unless registered to vote. Fewer blacks and Mexicans that way.

0
25

[–] DependasaurusRex 0 points 25 points (+25|-0) ago 

I thank God every day for leaving 2 weeks before they got busted, and am happy they got off free.

0
9

[–] Shiggz 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I had family there as well. They left about the same time. Surprise surprise cameras would always zoom in on the most rednecky inarticulate person they could find. Aggressively ignore anyone that didn't fit muh narrative.

0
10

[–] DependasaurusRex 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

Yeah, they did their best. I was only there for a week, and most of us were decent citizens who dressed alright and tried to stay clean cut, but the cameras always found the toothless, bubba guys. There was also zero destruction of property while there, as all believed in preserving history, even that of the natives. All the rest was done after and used for hit pieces.

0
2

[–] gazillions 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

The media coverage of that compared to the detailed and sensible explanation of what was going on from the victims themselves was one of my "holy crap, the media is flat out lying". Moments.

1
6

[–] JimboBillyBobJustice 1 points 6 points (+7|-1) ago 

Man look if you were there and you thought they were right...I applaud you for standing up for what you thought was right at that time....when that standoff became a personality conflict of The Bundy Family vs US Gov and not for the rights of the farmers that all grazed their herds on that land..then you guys had a good reason to distance yaselves from that shit

0
9

[–] DependasaurusRex 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

I left for family matters in all honesty. There was controversy there, sure, but the general principal still stood to us all, and especially for the guys in Burns that had to serve two terms for back burning a fire that would have wiped their entire property to the ground. The whole thing was convoluted by the government to begin with (as usual), but even the Bundy's were unjustly served to begin with.

0
21

[–] Caesarkid1 0 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago 

The judge set a hearing Wednesday to decide whether to free Parker and Drexler pending a decision by prosecutors whether to try them for a third time.

Fucking triple jeopardy.

0
7

[–] wewuzgoyim 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

How? The state can only try one time per crime, it's constitutionally illegal otherwise

1
14

[–] uvulectomy 1 points 14 points (+15|-1) ago 

Probably going for slight variations on a theme so it's technically not the same crime, even though it all falls under the same banner: pissing off the ruling class.

0
3

[–] Popsquat81 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

A hung jury is not an acquittal. It is only double jeopardy if they were acquitted (Found not guilty) and then re-tried. A hung jury allows the prosecution to re-try the case if they choose.

0
1

[–] Blackjack147 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Countersue for two counts of double jeopardy, then. Reassert to prosecution that the case is closed.

0
20

[–] DrPenguin 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago 

I'm ashamed at how far this had slipped from my thoughts. God bless these patriots.

1
12

[–] superspathi 1 points 12 points (+13|-1) ago 

Held every single one of them without offering bail. What an outrage. Dindus being held on armed robbery get released on recognizance so they can go out and intimidate/murder witnesses.

2
4

[–] green_man 2 points 4 points (+6|-2) ago 

Because it's very important to the feds to set the precedent that meager citizens have no rights when it comes to standing up to the unconstitutional assault on the rights of citizens. They don't give a flying fuck about nogs killing nogs, or nogs raping/killing a few white people.

0
3

[–] Obama_BinLadin 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Huge victory for Americanism, the Constitution, and civilization in general.

load more comments ▼ (7 remaining)