[–] [deleted] 0 points 52 points (+52|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
15

[–] reskeet 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago 

As someone who works for a company like this it would be easier to come out as a transgender dog raping bestiality fanatic who fucks dogs on the regular than it would be to admit that I have right leaning tendencies and voted for Trump. Hell i would probably get special treatment as a dog fucker for being "unique"

0
4

[–] GoatyMcGoatface 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Who wants to play Diversity Hire Bingo!

0
1

[–] Tsilent_Tsunami 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

As someone who works for a company like this

I'm not even going to ask.

0
8

[–] TheInevitableHulk 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

I'd bet a nickel that most of the guys there are little different than women

0
1

[–] DefenderOfTruth 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Hopefully a lot different. Where's the balance, otherwise?

[–] [deleted] 0 points 32 points (+32|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

1
40

[–] KikeFree 1 points 40 points (+41|-1) ago 

Google is a CIA/NSA/Mossad branch, and the SJW direction is not an accident. Their purpose/intent is to control the direction of society. Cost is not a factor because they can simply print more money.

0
5

[–] pby1000 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Well said.

0
2

[–] RoBatten 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I second this

0
19

[–] maltespier 0 points 19 points (+19|-0) ago 

come on now, those doodles don't virtue signal by themselves

0
23

[–] maltespier 0 points 23 points (+23|-0) ago  (edited ago)

they reacted to their internal SJW outcry thinking there would be an internal uprising if they didn't fire this guy. If this case blows up and they suffer a defeat, I am hopeful we can expect a lot more law suits

0
2

[–] RoBatten 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

The 2/3rds of their workforce that didn't "like" the journal posted on Google's "anonymous" network would have made a lot of problems, and the rest will just shut up or they'll be next. Unfortunately, I don't see a lawsuit prevailing. The journal's writer is not a "protected class," and he likely did violate some company policy. He'd probably have more luck challenging that specific policy than trying to get satisfied because he was fired. I feel badly for him. He only spoke the truth. Can't do that anywhere on the left coast . . .

0
16

[–] HappyMealBullshit 0 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago 

Google lets their advertisers target people by gender but when an employee says genders are different he gets canned. Politically correct human resources bullshit at it's finest.

0
4

[–] jbnunez 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

hahah excellent point. You can target on google all the demographics they think are irrelevant.

0
16

[–] Dark_Shroud 0 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago  (edited ago)

They were stupid and should have offered him a voluntary severance package. But that probably would have upset the perpetual children that they employ.

So now he has a good lawsuit and we might even get a legal precedent out of this. This can be a big win for common sense.

Edited for autocorrect not being correct.

0
7

[–] uvulectomy 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

*precedent

0
2

[–] Dark_Shroud 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Thanks for the heads up, auto correct screwed me on that one & I didn't catch it.

2
0

[–] edistojim 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

love when the grammar police get corrected.

0
2

[–] idk 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Possibly, but Google probably has a decent employment contact and a buttload of lawyers.

0
1

[–] Dark_Shroud 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

And California has an elephant sized ass load of employment laws that Google contracts & management do not get to just violate.

0
0

[–] RoBatten 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

This is right. He's got an uphill battle that he likely can' win . . .

5
0

[–] dontdoxxmefaggots 5 points 0 points (+5|-5) ago 

legal president

LOL PRESIDENT YOU FUCKING NIGGER

0
14

[–] Dark_Shroud 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

All the unsucked dicks in the world and you're spending time on Voat.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
11

[–] jbnunez 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

Or a break up.

0
5

[–] Dark_Shroud 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

0
0

[–] Tsilent_Tsunami 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I was thinking more of a squad/team/group of suicide-boomers paying them a visit to atone for our generation. Pun intended.

Disclaimer: obviously one of those non-serious internet jokes

0
10

[–] TheCalm 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

Diversity of opinion is only diverse if you AGREE WITH MY OPINION ONLY.

0
4

[–] UglyTruth 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

It's kind of remarkable how blatantly hypocritical Google is about this.

0
0

[–] GoatyMcGoatface 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

And yet I'm sure the behavior is already well outlined if I were to pull out the ol' Marx or Ingalls literature

0
3

[–] HappyMealBullshit 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Exactly. Where are the right-wing, redneck, bible thumping conservatives working at Google? Oh that's right, the word "diversity" doesn't include those people for some reason. If your opinions fall outside the range of the "diversity bubble" then it's perfectly acceptable to treat you like shit.

0
9

[–] HeavyBeefCurtain 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Immediate reaction from the majority of women in Google in response to the memo is to have a knee-jerk reaction and PMS

V I N D I C A T E D

0
1

[–] GoatyMcGoatface 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

What level triggly are you on if you get triggered by someone accusing you of overly emotional response?

0
0

[–] cthulian_axioms 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

[TRIGGERING INTENSIFIES]

load more comments ▼ (12 remaining)