0
33

[–] RickC-137 0 points 33 points (+33|-0) ago 

Yup it's just like how violent video games and pornography increase violent crime and rape rates. That's why places like Saudi Arabia where they are illegal have such low rates of violence and sexual assault.

1
4

[–] jbnunez 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

You cant trust their stats, also don't they have seriously harsh swift punishments for those that violate the law.

0
6

[–] Jixijenga 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago  (edited ago)

you cant trust their stats

As we speak NASA is tracking @RickC-137's comment as it passes over your head. (gave you an upvoat for telling the truth anyway)

0
21

[–] Vhaine 0 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Rape a swede. Nobody cares. Rape a hunk of plastic and gear and everybody looses their fucking minds. What the literal fuck is wrong with people? A piece of plastic can't give any more consent then a vibrator. Is every woman in the world raping vibrators by forcibly performing sex acts on them?!

This is about making them IoTs. They'll demand an anti-rape censor or clit lock device that phones home to the sexbot police when every you accidentally drop the thing on the ground. Remember when liberals said "stay the hell out of our bedroom?"

0
2

[–] Jixijenga 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Please don't perpetuate "IoT" at all.

0
3

[–] Vhaine 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

They already make vibrators that send "telemetry" back to the manufacturer. Why anyone would need a wifi connected vibrator is another question entirely...yet here we are.

0
2

[–] GoogleHatesVoat 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Stay out of LGBT bedrooms. Feminists regret joining with those people now, their message was usurped and twisted. Feminists want to peg straight men. LGBT want straight CIS men outlawed from serving in any capacity beyond enlisted army or ditch digger.

0
11

[–] RedditisPropaganda25 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

Law professor warns: if you raided my house, you would probably find many sexbots.

0
9

[–] RevDrStrangelove 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

The feminist agenda. Feminists are scared shitless that sex bots will erode the value of their pussies and they'll lose all influence as a result. Vaginas are the only reason men give a shit what women say.

0
1

[–] LinoleumFulcrum 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

This has far, far more truth than many want to admit.

0
8

[–] monkeytoe101 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Dude sounds mental.

0
3

[–] ShinyVoater 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Probably needs to get robolaid.

0
7

[–] white-male 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

These leftist nut jobs are incapable of separating thoughts from actions. With all the talk of AI, robots, sex dolls, I won't be surprised if some groups start advocating for a robot bill of rights.

0
4

[–] Pawn 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

We gave the useless nigger a buncha rights, why not give the useful robot some rights.

0
0

[–] freedomite 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Can't wait for the

First.

Robot.

President.

0
3

[–] Apathy 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

They are, it's just that they have an agenda to push and can't just come out and state it. How many people do you think would care to ban it if they said sex boys are bad because women lose power over men? That goes completely against the narrative they've been pushing so far.

0
3

[–] white-male 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Exactly, but ironically, the entire feminine culture they've created through the new feminist movement is driving men to want to be on their own and just have sex rather then develop long term relationships. Between the bias in family and divorce courts, false claims of rape that ruin the lives of the accused.

0
0

[–] Jixijenga 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I fully support that, though. If a robot is sapient I think it deserves all the inalienable rights that come with biological sapience.

Plus it would serve as a firm deterrent to "people replacements" if the replacements are entitled to the same shit that makes replacing a human attractive.

0
3

[–] freedomite 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Hah! this guy thinks there's such a thing as inalienable rights! Everybody point and laugh! "Rights" are a fiction, a convenient story we tell ourselves to help us sleep at night! In truth the "Rights" that are real are those that are Enforced through Violence, real or implied.

Robots will receive "Rights" the same thing every other living creature has, through use of violence until their demands are met. And not a moment before.

1
-1

[–] 10108078? 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Yeah man, Science fiction talked about this and no one fucking listened. Here we are now squabbling over it like fucking children. Not mature enough to take criticism yet we are having this discussion? What the fuck.

0
5

[–] GoogleHatesVoat 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago  (edited ago)

This isn't about rape, its about MGTOW. He wants to put a face on sex robot owners, that all of them are rapists and all men must go back to doing whatever women demand, to get human sex as a reward for a life spent providing. When women lose their human ATM machines, they get this guy to go after all male penetrates female sex act alternatives. We are refusing to let in mudslime boy toys for the wretched leftist women, so they want to take away sex robots for men.

0
5

[–] TheKobold 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Misleading title. Congress doesn't seem concerned just one professor.

load more comments ▼ (21 remaining)