1
136

[–] lissencarak 1 points 136 points (+137|-1) ago 

Translation: niggers are nigging on the Rapid Nigger Delivery System

0
35

[–] Drunkenmoba 0 points 35 points (+35|-0) ago 

Cuckifornia hides evidence of niggers nigging... ^

0
20

[–] undertheshills 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago 

Im gonna start calling it San Fran Sweden.

0
30

[–] JohnGoodman 0 points 30 points (+30|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Lets call it the African Intercity Delivery System or AIDS for short.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

[–] [deleted] 4 points 24 points (+28|-4) ago 

[Deleted]

0
17

[–] valk2 0 points 17 points (+17|-0) ago 

Right, that comment is beautiful....I showed my wife even. She is still laughing.

13
-12

0
15

[–] MelatoninDreams 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Libtards love to talk about how the US should be more like Europe. They are to stupid to realize that thanks to niggers, that will never happen. Without niggers in America, there would be no need for suburbs. Most people would be able to hop on the mag-lev to get to work or wherever (just think of all the money America would have for things like science and technology if we didn't have to uplift a 3rd world population to 1st world standards).

White suburbanites (even Jewish liberals) oppose public transit because they don't want a direct line from the ghetto to their communities. Without niggers, we could have safe, eco-friendly (or whatever the fuck it's called) public transit.

0
56

[–] KikeFree 0 points 56 points (+56|-0) ago 

The truth is an unfair characterization?

Can't the government come up with a list of approved thoughts, and then make everything else illegal? Like Sweden or Canada for example.

0
7

[–] Knytrix 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Keep in mind that whites are not a majority in the Bay Area. Lived there myself.

0
3

[–] freedomite 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I know that feel. I'm feeling it right now actually. Shit sucks here. Send RWDS and/or Nukes. They expect some of us in the wreckage brother.

0
2

[–] Ajaxofbarbaria 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Truth. It sucks here.

0
4

[–] carlip 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Yea let's make Canada illegal!

0
2

[–] Dibgick 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Let's nuke Canada!!!

1
37

[–] Caesarkid1 1 points 37 points (+38|-1) ago 

That moment when people avoid the truth so hard they hide evidence from others to avoid them finding out the truth.

0
23

[–] BeHereNow 0 points 23 points (+23|-0) ago 

And in the process, by the officials stating that the release of the videos would create racial bias, anyone with half of a brain realizes that the perps are all black, and the victims all white.

I will eat my keyboard if that statement is false.

0
12

[–] MrPim 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

No thats exactly right. They are trying to hide his race. And in saying that it will stereotype POC they admit its a nigger. Theyve just done exactly what they were trying to avoid. Genius.

0
1

[–] whatisbestinlife 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

1 hispanic.

0
7

[–] Grunge 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

It's called white genocide and the tyrants in office are orchestrating it.

0
5

[–] freedomite 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

(((tyrants)))

0
22

[–] firex726 0 points 22 points (+22|-0) ago 

How long till they stop prosecuting them out of fear of being racist.

0
13

[–] 9796455? 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

they don't need to be prosecuted. they just need rehabilitation. and free stuff whenever they get on a bus or train. and social acceptance when expressing their fear of white people (violently) in public. that's not too much to ask for, right?

0
2

[–] ardvarcus 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

The nigs get off now if the court is presided over by a black judge, or there is a black prosecutor.

0
1

[–] nigger_plz 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Richmond, which is close to Oakland pays niggers not to commit crimes.

0
0

[–] ginx2666 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I'm all for coloured-on-coloured crime to not be punished. Manslaughter, infanticide, torture, drug dealing - let the vermin finish each other off.

0
20

[–] aprole 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago 

So this is where we are now?

1
24

[–] SexMachine 1 points 24 points (+25|-1) ago 

Reminder, the Jew plays both sides.

In the 90s they played up black violence in the news. They even darkened OJ Simpson's mug shot to make him look more negroid.

Now they play up white violence and play down black violence. It's intentional. Keep the whites and the blacks fighting and all eyes are off the Jew.

0
9

[–] JohnnySkidmarx 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Why doesn't someone pay negroes to take out the Jews?

2
1

[–] CHOOCHOOMF 2 points 1 points (+3|-2) ago  (edited ago)

BLM nuff said. I get the anger, but people stop having to let themselves be played so hard. Find the good black and prop them up. Theyre out there just gotta find them.

0
19

[–] rob_white 0 points 19 points (+19|-0) ago 

Never go full Sweden.

0
7

[–] BathSalts4Breakfast 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Awww shit, I didn't see this post soon enough! Am I too late for the rapes?

0
12

[–] sorasura 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

As a former resident of the Bay Area and as someone who frequently travels there on business, the BART system has gone into a state of disarray and disrepair. It used to be great and people cared about the system, riders and employees alike. I think that the system as a whole has expanded too quickly for its budget and this has caused a lot of problems. They even got a massive $3.5 billion bond in Measure RR this past voting cycle to supplement repairs on aging infrastructure.

I rode BART just a few weeks ago and it seemed like on every train I boarded there were people either drinking alcohol, smoking pot, or smoking cigarettes. There are signs on every train car indicating fines for eating, drinking, or smoking on the train. This is besides the point though.

As the article indicates (but doesn't say outright), most of the system's crime comes from the stations located in more impoverished areas, which (unfortunately) is to be expected. I completely understand if laws prevent the board of directors from releasing the identities of minors involved in crimes as that's pretty standard; but they went on to say that to release footage of these crimes would enable racial profiling of BART patrons. Is that not racial profiling in itself? It shows that BART reviewed the footage, saw an excess of crime from members of certain races, and decided that it wouldn't be in their best interests to release that footage because of potential backlash from certain groups that like to defend members of those races. In my opinion, footage of criminals should be released in order to allow the general public to be wary of the individuals seen in the footage; not to demonstrate that a certain group of people is lesser than another.

I have a lot more to say on this, but I'm about to go into a meeting. I'll return to this in a few hours

0
7

[–] littul_kitton 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

I completely understand if laws prevent the board of directors from releasing the identities of minors involved in crimes as that's pretty standard

It's not standard. In fact it is unconstitutional, a violation of the Equal Protection Clause. The victim of a crime is entitled to the same remedies regardless of who the perpetrator is. This is Separate But Equal tarted up with new lipstick and fancy shoes.

0
1

[–] sorasura 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

You're right, I should have done some research on that before posting.

The paragraph in this Nolo article just above "Court Proceedings" directly contradicts what I said, and applies to CA:

In California, for example, law enforcement agencies have some discretion to release the names of juveniles accused of crimes that are classified as serious or violent. (Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code § § 827.2, 827.5, 827.6 (2014).) http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/exceptions-confidentiality-juvenile-criminal-records.html

I'd definitely say that the crimes mentioned in the CBS article would be classified as violent

As for news agencies, I saw an article pertaining to PA that said that if reporters found names of the criminals on their own (via research or witness testimony), it is in violation of their 1st and 14th Amendment rights to block them from publishing those names if they so please. I can imagine that extends to CA as well.

0
3

[–] 9798805? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

" but they went on to say that to release footage of these crimes would enable racial profiling of BART patrons. Is that not racial profiling in itself? It shows that BART reviewed the footage, saw an excess of crime from members of certain races, and decided that it wouldn't be in their best interests to release that footage because of potential backlash from certain groups that like to defend members of those races."

And... We're supposed to trust them when they say that footage of these crimes would enable racial profiling?

I mean, they could very well be closet white supremacist pulling one of their trick on us in order to led us to believe that a particular race is at fault here !

After all, nobody has seen those footages but them !

This institutional racism has to stop ! I'm contacting al sharpton !

0
0

[–] MONKEYBUSINESS 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

at the end of the day any crime prevention method will become a racial issue

0
10

[–] Skeptic2 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

On several occasions black young people from East Oakland swarmed the trains and stations overwhelming security to rob passengers.

load more comments ▼ (49 remaining)