0
45

[–] pyres 0 points 45 points (+45|-0) ago 

Cut? That's what happens accidentally on the sharp edge of a water slide.

The word you're looking for is mutilated.

0
4

[–] Tor1 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

100 or more in Michigan.

Over a half a billion worldwide.

There are 850 million muslim women in the world.

The majority of them have had parts of their exterior vagina removed. Or totally removed. Or had the giant gaping wound closed up except a small 4mm hole to allow urine and blood to pass through.

These women then have to get permission to go to a butcher to have their hole reopened so they can have sex with their owners, and bear him how ever many children he wants.

It is this treating of women like livestock that is giving them a competitive advantage against other nations.

They don't have to spend any money or effort trying to woo women or find a mate.

They are assigned some number of women by religious and family authorities. These women having nothing else available but to bear and raise these children

Each of their women squirts out 8.1 children each on average.

This mutilation of women is a valid reason to invade all Muslim countries and get them back under control of their technological and social superiors.

If we would have allowed the Indians to continue chasing buffalo and live in teepees, they too would be living cheaper than us, and out producing enemy offspring that want to kill us.

We can't afford to continue to let Muslims gain in strength and number, while living easier and better lives besides.

Deus Vult.

31
-27

[–] [deleted] 4 points 18 points (+22|-4) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

5
6

[–] tapsnapornap 5 points 6 points (+11|-5) ago 

Cutting off the clitoris would be equivalent of cutting off the head of your penis.

That being said can't we not support either? They are both barbaric.

1
5

[–] EllenPaosEgo 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

Agreed they are both barbaric. Also fuck you your analogy is shit. The top 2 most sensitive parts of a mans penis gets cut off. Then the head being the 3rd most sensitive becomes dry and loses most of it's feeling. Both are bad agreed, but every time a guy points out that they are both bad some woman or fedora comes up and tries to claim fgm is worse and makes that exact bullshit comparison without even considering that the man is actually losing the most sensitive parts. Not just "a flap of skin" lile the pro circumcision propaganda claims. Waffleman made a great point that people like you don't really care that this happens to men. You proved him completely right with your "oh but the poor women have it so much worse" post. I was 8 when they snipped me. They do this barbaric shit to children. My mom said it was "so I would fit in with the other boys" and it happened no matter how much I protested. After being snipped the brainwaves of the baby/child never go back to normal. It isn't just babies that don't get anything to help with the pain either. I felt everything, and a nurse kept my eyes open because "it is a necessary part of the circumcision." Fuck you with your oh no but the wymynz bullshit. This happens to millions of men like me an no one bats an eye. Same sort of barbaric shit happenes for the same reasons to 100 women and everyone loses their minds. Statistically speaking more babies die from circumcision than will ever actually need it as a legit medical operation in their lifetime. Since there is no line saying snip here complications in the circumcision are upwards of 25%. There is no good reason for anyone to get this shit forced on a child. However it is people like you that completely exaggerate the differences and play down how bad it actually is for men that will keep circumcision legal.

0
0

[–] unclejimbo 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Can't we support both for sandniggers? Fuck them, I don't care about them or their women.

2
1

[–] Deflo56 2 points 1 points (+3|-2) ago 

2
5

[–] prairie 2 points 5 points (+7|-2) ago 

No amount of benefit will justify cutting off part of an infant's body as a routine procedure.

1
2

[–] EllenPaosEgo 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

More babies die during those procedures than will ever need it in their lifetime. I'm pretty sure there is no "benifit" of losing the most sensitive parts of your body that is worth risking your childs life over. Also your source comes from a litteral jew. What a coincidence.

6
-2

[–] ALargeRock 6 points -2 points (+4|-6) ago 

New scientific evidence shows the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks of the procedure, but the benefits are not great enough to recommend routine circumcision for all newborn boys

This is why there is a distinct difference between FGM and circumcision. This why one is considered mutilation and the other is not.

Mutilation: Mutilation or maiming is an act of physical injury that degrades the appearance or function of any living body.

3
-2

[–] 22jam22 3 points -2 points (+1|-3) ago 

Ya no shit! Im not jewish all irish brithish scottish 7th generation americans.. Im circumcised some reason? Born in 75 so i guess this was thought of a health issue i am thinking.. But i like my dick how it is, how girls deal with uncircumsised dicks is beyond me look like earth worms.

0
8

[–] Mr_Quagmire 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

But it's part of their culture! To make them stop would be racist.

0
4

[–] ElectroGypsy 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Feminism: "Fuck that! What about the real issue of men sitting comfortably on the bus!?"

0
0

[–] Titus-of-Voat [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Thank goodness feminists are tackling the important issues of our time.

0
2

[–] TimelapseDude 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

"MUTILATION OF CHILDREN"

0
2

[–] Birddirt 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

This needs to be stomped out asap. Can't let this shit happen in the US, AT ALL.

0
1

[–] RevoltNow 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

There's no question this is wrong, but I just can't take the outrage seriously when mutilating boys remains completely legal and is rarely even spoken against in any kind of mainstream media. I'm aware the what they do to girls is often much worst, some truly horrifying shit... but not always, one version only removes the clitoral hood, which is literally the same body part, and no one makes a distinction. It's still evil because it's, girls being mutilated and not boys, which apparently would be OK. Hell sometimes they even do less, a symbolic "nick" with essentially no permanent consequences, and it's still wrong, while cutting parts of boys is A-OK.

0
1

[–] PsyOp 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

If they admit to 100 it's probably 1,000.

load more comments ▼ (15 remaining)