You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

9
2

[–] MD7COVENANT 9 points 2 points (+11|-9) ago  (edited ago)

Have you considered that, while certainly not blameless, his statement to citizens about living under the threat of terror being a normal part of city life is one that makes me seethe with anger, myself, he's not the one who makes the call on jailing these individuals? That lies more in the nation's federal, rather than civic, security services/law enforcement, and leaders? No doubt Mr. Khan is one of the lead apologists and deserves considerable spite for his attitudes regarding the terrorism in London, and absolutely is a disgrace to his position, absolutely a disgrace, but the security state clearly has a great deal to profit from these attacks, and it is becoming expected to hear that the individuals involved in a terror attack against the British people have been under surveillance, and yet not stopped.

It is imperative that citizens start vehemently and persistently demanding to know why arrests have not been made at the first sign of terrorist activity, rather than allowing it to happen.

[–] [deleted] 1 point 12 points (+13|-1) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

1
3

[–] MD7COVENANT 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

Yes, all true, but if you have actually been following the recent attacks, it is at the state level where this information is stalling, it isn't even getting into this wicked, grinning apologist's hands to fumble and fester. Don't let your hate for Khan absolve Mi5 for their willing complacence.

https://archive.fo/LQTrm

Ignoring warnings and allowing good citizens to die at the hands of terrorists is business as usual, and focusing all hatred and rage on just this piece of shit (and note, I am not saying that he isn't worthy of it, just that the scope of the failure to protect is much larger and more sinister/ugly) is myopic.

4
7

[–] AOU 4 points 7 points (+11|-4) ago 

MD7COVENANT

Member for 1.3 Hours

Go back to faggit with your taqiyya, cuck.

0
4

[–] J_Darnley 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I think he is partly right about the Mayor of London not having the power to prosecute these people. The Crown Prosecution Service are the ones who make that call. However they rely upon the police force(s) to their investigation and I think the Mayor does have more influence over them. He can certainly guide where they should spend their resources. He could say "focus more on this right-wing hate speech and less on my poor, oppressed people of colour".

Save some ire for the others who deserve it.

4
-3

[–] MD7COVENANT 4 points -3 points (+1|-4) ago 

No.

0
2

[–] Not_A_Large_Duck 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I think it's better if citizens demand the right to arm themselves en masse.

5
-5

[–] common_sense 5 points -5 points (+0|-5) ago  (edited ago)

He never said that living with terrorism is a "normal part of life." This quote keeps being taken out of context.

All he was saying was that big cities need to remain vigilant.

0
1

[–] ArtsyLiberationz 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

London Elected a moslime Mayor Who Defended 9/11 Terrorists, he had dealings with Islamic extremists, including convicted terrorist Yasser al-Siri, Khan saw no problem with banning rightwingers, Conservatives from traveling to Britain but represented Farrakhan in his attempts to overturn a ban on coming to Britain in the early 2000s. He says: Even the islamist worst jihadi people deserve a legal defence. His dealings with Babar Ahmad form a more complicated tale. On the face of it, Ahmad is yet another unsavoury character, blamed for setting up a website which inspired a generation of extremists. After becoming an MP, Khan supported his battle against extradition to the USA http://www.theaustralian.com.au/in-depth/terror/muslim-mayor-defends-citys-safety/news-story/8cb2b52f6ce39c2aa7b39908218ffdfd the Mayor