You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] bush2016nazi [S] ago 

It's a boring rhetorical question, me and you both know that without fractional reserve that bankers can't get rich and flood the world with toilet paper. A pure economy based on labor, doesn't allow the leisure class to collect interest on the working class.

A gold based currency economy is based on labor, family, and living. A paper based currency, is mercantile economy based on faux paper where non-workers can get food from a farmer.

In a non-fractional reserve situation the GOV couldn't pump up the stock market 10 trillion year 2 year, U must have a clue on some this? yes or no?

0
0

[–] Firebrigade ago  (edited ago)

A pure economy based on labor, doesn't allow the leisure class to collect interest on the working class.

Why shouldn't people be able to make money on capital? If you could not make money on capital no one would ever invest.

A gold based currency economy is based on labor, family, and living.

This is nonsense. Not only that, it is weird propaganda and I can't believe you buy it.

U must have a clue on some this? yes or no?

You seem to have no clue. The advantages of fiat currency far outweigh the downsides. You seem not to know what they are or refuse to acknowledge them.

Labor is fine and dandy but their worth is determined by what they produce in a market not the type of currency used. Capital has every right to make money.

0
0

[–] bush2016nazi [S] ago 

A pure economy based on labor, doesn't allow the leisure class to collect interest on the working class.

Why shouldn't people be able to make money on capital? If you could not make money on capital no one would ever invest.


Why shouldn't wolves be able to fleece and rob, and rape the sheep?

Because its god damn fucking wrong.