[–] [deleted] 3 points 71 points (+74|-3) ago 

[Deleted]

5
63

[–] LardOn4Bacon 5 points 63 points (+68|-5) ago 

Lack of fucking respect.

0
5

[–] Pwning4Ever 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

They wouldnt refer to their doctors as mr. Smitg

0
35

[–] aaronC 0 points 35 points (+35|-0) ago 

They are still in denial of him being the president.

8
2

[–] cthulian_axioms 8 points 2 points (+10|-8) ago 

The North knows only one President whose name is Sanders.

slams beer stein on table

THE PRESIDENT IN THE NORTH!

6
15

[–] maxoverdrive 6 points 15 points (+21|-6) ago 

Because they're evil liberal fucks, of course. Liberals work for the forces of evil, regardless of whether they recognize it or not.

1
1

[–] Ozzsanity 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

Oh we recognise it. Hail Satan! With the Goat of Mendes sit at his left hand.

1
4

[–] Turn_Coat 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

They're trying to assign him a title, like Ceasar. Heil Trump!

4
42

[–] cousineerie 4 points 42 points (+46|-4) ago 

How long before some liberal Federal Judge says we can't withdraw?

3
34

[–] gentlemanadventurer 3 points 34 points (+37|-3) ago  (edited ago)

two seconds after he signs it. Apparently you can run the country from a Federal bench.

2
13

[–] cousineerie 2 points 13 points (+15|-2) ago 

I'm surprised there isn't a Judge inside the Oval Office so they can put a hold on the E.O.'s before the ink dries.

1
4

[–] Pwning4Ever 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

Hundreds of unelected judges control this control apparently.

0
13

[–] BlueDrache 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago  (edited ago)

In this case, I believe, only Congress can annul a treaty ... but it's still up in the air.

Presently, there is no official Supreme Court ruling on whether the President has the power to break a treaty without the approval of Congress, and the courts also declined to interfere when President George W. Bush unilaterally withdrew the United States from the ABM Treaty in 2002, six months after giving the required notice of intent.[11]

So ... there is precedent for Trump's actions.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

1
20

[–] MrHarryReems 1 points 20 points (+21|-1) ago 

This would be terrific for the U.S.

0
13

[–] 8913373? 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

And great for Canada too. Fuck Mexico.

0
7

[–] gazillions 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Mexico will have to look after Mexico's interests. This should help clean up their corruption and get any Mexicans with a brain involved in doing that.

0
3

[–] mamwad 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Mexico's agricultural sector hates NAFTA. Also, the Zapatistas are still technically at war with the Mexican government over NAFTA.

The truth is that NAFTA benefits American companies at the expense of everyone else, including American workers.

0
1

[–] ReinhardsLegacy 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

0
2

[–] Aldo 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Maybe in the long run. But a lot of supply chains require the free movement of goods between US-Can-Mex. It'll likely raise the price of many things for Americans and in the short-term could cause some delays or shortages of things like cars and clothes.

0
0

[–] DrShafty 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Then maybe it would be cheaper to produce then here. Then... Cut welfare spending and wait to see if the lazy get off their lazy asses and go to work or starve.

0
2

[–] knightwarrior41 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

yeah i agree

0
10

[–] abear 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

the entire auto industry is never, EVER, going to let Trump get rid of NAFTA. NO FUCKING WAY it happens.

[–] [deleted] 1 points 9 points (+10|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] abear 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

you live in a fantasy land, friend.

3
0

[–] Tzitzimitl 3 points 0 points (+3|-3) ago 

that "giant sucking sound" is never going away until we implement the Final Solution

3
6

[–] PoeticallyIncorrect 3 points 6 points (+9|-3) ago 

Best case scenario: He does it anyway and lowers business tax rates to "save jobs"

Worst case scenario: We keep NAFTA and don't reduce taxes

Likely case: EO is signed ending NAFTA, liberal judge blocks the order, auto manufacturers work out a deal to receive federal benefits, NAFTA ends with weird stipulations passed to more or less keep everything the same but make it a little worse for us.

9
-3

[–] Dibgick 9 points -3 points (+6|-9) ago 

You know nothing about the US international trade. If he gets away with it 30% of US industrial value chains goes down the drain in a single day.

1
0

[–] MedicalMountainGoat 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Auto industry is on the way out though. Automated rigs are already a thing and will become prevalent during the next decade.

3
-1

[–] Dibgick 3 points -1 points (+2|-3) ago 

Auto industry, manufacturing, steel, agriculture, tobacco & spirits, oil & gas, there's no industrial or trade sector that would be untouched.

1
0

[–] abear 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

you cant bring facts to voat or else you hurt fragile snowflake sensibilities like vortexcortex up there. feels over reals.

1
10

[–] derram 1 points 10 points (+11|-1) ago 

https://archive.is/1giUh | https://vgy.me/j67GCB.png :

Donald Trump to sign executive order withdrawing US from Nafta | The Independent

"Donald Trump's team is readying an executive order to take the US out of the North American Free Trade Agreement (Nafta), it has been reported."

'Mr Trump has been consistently promising his base of support that he will build a nearly 2,000 mile border wall. ', "Withdrawing from the trade agreement between Canada, Mexico, and the US was one of Mr Trump's key promises on the campaign trail in 2016."

'According to Mr Trump this puts US dairy farmers at a disadvantage. ', "This is not Mr trump's first foray into withdrawing the US from major trade agreements."

This has been an automated message.

0
8

[–] WD_Pelley 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

This is not Mr trump's first foray into withdrawing the US from major trade agreements. Early in his term, he took the US out of the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP), which was close to being fully approved among the 12 nations participating.

Capitalize the "T" and call him "President Trump" you disrespectful fucks.

0
7

[–] SirDigbyChikenCaesar 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

My guess is he isn't going to sign it but use it as a threat to renegotiate, we'll be hearing about delegates showing up to discuss making some changes next week.

0
3

[–] goblin_ghost 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

How does it feel to be proven right in less than eight hours?

0
2

[–] SirDigbyChikenCaesar 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Oh did happen already? It feels hard not to be a bragger honestly. But knowing what Trump is going to do is easy to figure out once you know how he operates, he says one thing, people go wild, and he uses the first statement as leverage to get what he actually wants.

Ever. Fucking. Time. So don't freak out when he says stuff. Don't get too excited.

2
6

[–] bareknuckledragon 2 points 6 points (+8|-2) ago 

I wonder which globalist dick head is gonna hold this one back.

0
3

[–] BlueDrache 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Soros. Duh?

[–] [deleted] 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
2

[–] deretsigernu 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Rahm Emanuel - current mayor of Chicago and lead orchestrator of NAFTA. He's also a (((dual citizen))).

load more comments ▼ (22 remaining)