You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

2
15

[–] freedumbz 2 points 15 points (+17|-2) ago 

I thought that after the child prostitution thing they couldn't get lower... I was wrong.

0
4

[–] armday2day 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Pretty sure the child prostitution thing meant the child wouldn't face legal penalties

0
6

[–] MetalAegis 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago  (edited ago)

It also means the victims couldn't be questioned or interrogated, thus eliminating a source of leads for tracking down pimps.

1
4

[–] clamhurt_legbeard 1 point 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

Yeah, it entices pimps to force underage girls into prostitution, then dump them when they turn 18 (and the cops start arresting them). An 18 year old woman who had been a child prostitute for 4 years is only MORE fucked up when she can get arrested.

Better to decriminalize prostitution itself. This half-measure bullshit is just going to make more child prostitutes.

0
1

[–] TotallyNotAFed 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

The child prostitution thing is not the horror you think it is. It is actually a good idea. The intention is to protect children from the legal consequences of being trafficed/groomed and pimped, not the pimps. The pimps still get fucked by angry black/hispanic dudes in prison, the children don't.

0
0

[–] HeavyBrain ago 

Its all conected.