0
9

[–] Spaceballs-1 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

How curious that she'd have this info. I wonder where it came from.

Nice catch BTW by the truepundit.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
5

[–] Spaceballs-1 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Or she replies "At this point does it really matter?"

0
0

[–] ChronicMathDebater 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

It's worth pointing out that she would have had the information in the article before the article was published anyway - it's known that Slate/Huffpo/etc. sent a lot of their articles to Hillary for approval before publishing during the campaign, and this was revealed through the Podesta Emails.

So, yes, it is curious that she'd have that info. We know exactly why she would have that info before it was published, and we know exactly in what way Slate is being scummy!

That said, this doesn't prove that Hillary wasn't getting valuable information from this sort of wiretap. However, this article is not sufficient to make me believe in any further wrongdoing than that of which she has already been proven guilty.

0
4

[–] gazillions 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

A covert server linking Trump to Russian based bank?? I don't think that came from any wiretap. I think it was just made up bullshit.

0
3

[–] MedicalMountainGoat 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Headline should be BUSTED AGAIN

0
2

[–] FishFake 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

0
0

[–] movebackward 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/cnn/

Factual Reporting: HIGH

It looks like the bias fact checker has some bias and fact issues itself.

0
0

[–] FishFake 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

spot on about the centre left bias cnn has though. It's a guide rather then a bible of unerring truths.

0
2

[–] Federal_Delta 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Add more charges on the indictment...no more mobster politics

1
0

[–] RagnarokAngel 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

"That plays great before the election. Now, we're not gonna do that." --Trump

0
2

[–] ThisOtherGuy 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Explains how she had illegal access to his tax records.

0
0

[–] Echo59 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

So if she had access to the tax records and these show ties from Trump... shouldn't we have the right to know everything? From the tax records to how she got them.

0
1

[–] GoodGodKirk 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

While i wish it was, I'm not sure this is much of anything. It's not like she's claiming a government source provided the info. Plausible deniability perhaps?

it does seem to be catching up to the Clinton's, but oh so slowly. And can they stick any of it to them or will they wiggle their way out?

0
0

[–] Echo59 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

This is nothing. She could have got the document from many sources. It could even be leaked by the parties, or other parties. This is not a smoking gun. Is just a stray bullet.

Moreover, if Trump uses this as argument to say it is a proof, then he is admitting to the Russian ties. So this leads to nowhere. It's just crap pseudo-journalism that any serious editor would have turned down, except at the Huntington and similar.

0
0

[–] GoodGodKirk 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

How is he admitting to russian ties? That makes no sense.

0
1

[–] FritzTheKat 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Lock that bucket of pus up...Start draining the swamp with the filthy pond scum Clintons..the DC cesspool stinks to high heaven..cut out the DC cancer with a dull chainsaw..

load more comments ▼ (3 remaining)