You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
8

[–] senpaithatignoresyou 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

I see they have figured out the plan.

How do you go from being just a simple billionaire, to becoming a household idol? Why be rich, when you can be love and respected by everyone, on top of being even richer?

Why go to all the trouble to be president, when you have a lot of nice things already?

Because there is a chance for you to burn the establishment to the ground, and rebuild it from scratch,your way. A chance to make the family name mean something for decades or centuries.

That is the Trump plan.

0
1

[–] teatime 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I'm not sure if one man should have the power to rebuild our government though. It took a lot of smart men a long time to get us to this point. I'm not anti-trump, but I am anti-autocracy.

0
1

[–] senpaithatignoresyou 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I'm not anti-trump, but I am anti-autocracy.

Same here, but this is just my hypothesis as to why so much effort was put into the last election.

One bit of good news, is that peter thiel funded the top 3 republican candidates in the primaries. I suspect he is playing a part in all of this, and that would explain why they know all the dirty secrets.

0
0

[–] Free_Radical 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

When a system is as corrupt as this, one autocratic man has a better chance of changing it.

Placing 100 people "in charge" will always fail because the majority will get corrupted and subvert the rest. Placing them one by one will, eventually, result in a candidate who'll flip the table - if he can survive the deep state.

0
0

[–] oedipusaurus_rex 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I agree that one person shouldn't hold that much power, but it's incumbent on everyone in a country to make sure that this doesn't happen. We've been shirking our duty on that front.

0
0

[–] Shekelstein6M 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

but I am anti-autocracy

Why? Do you believe that a multitude of people is better suited to leadership? If so, why? You wouldn't want a committee piloting your plane, or commanding the crew on a ship, or commanding troops on the battlefield. All of the greatest leaders throughout history were autocrats, or as close to it as possible.

The strongest and the best should lead, not the most popular. And above all, they should all follow a hierarchical structure of command.

1
0

[–] ThisIsCathartic 1 points 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

When did Trump explain his secret plan to you? You have strong brain, think good.