You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–] [deleted] ago 

[Deleted]

0
2

[–] Sev_ 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I don't have an issue with NATO as a mutual defense and intelligence sharing organization, which is what it was started as, and is supposed to be. It's not though. Somehow it's become the "America will handle our national defense while we spend our own money internally on social projects and infrastructure" club, and a platform to push social and economic changes to other states via "peer pressure".

I don't have an issue with the UN being an international body in which member states can discuss issues, assist in relieving natural humanitarian crises as a group across national lines (famines, floods, diseases, natural disasters, etc) , or act as an independent tribunal for obviously heinous things like genocide (by "black balling" truely offensive non-member states).

I do not think it has any business being an international lawmaking body, pushing social or economic policy on members, making loans or being the world police and interfering in every little civil war and conflict around the globe. I think all members of such an organization should have an equal share in both the responsibilities and obligations (financial and otherwise) - notice I said equal, not equitable - just because the US is bigger and wealthier does not mean we should be shelling out more cash, equipment, soldiers.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

[Deleted]