You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
1

[–] Spacehuman 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

That's a good propaganda line. The circular logic is a bit too obvious, inserting weakness as their motivation and then circle back around, taking your assumption as a given and using it to arrive at a conclusion.

You'll take in some Idiots with that line of reasoning. Of course, the Slovaks would say it's not out of weakness. If I kick a man out of my house for not following my rules, it's not out of weakness, it's out of strength and respect for myself. I say they have the right to decide who 'enters their house' because it effect their lives and their future.

And since you disparage their culture (suggesting it is not worth preserving) , what is your cultural background. Does it warrant preserving any more or less?

0
0

[–] alalzia ago 

They are acting like their culture is in danger although it survived centuries of foreign (Hungarian) occupation , if they see themselves as weaklings who am i to argue ?

Of course it is their right to turn them down but do you know how Greece treats illegals? they lock them in concentration camps to die of strange diseases and it won't be long till locals and tourists (some of the camps are on islands or close to areas even Slovaks visit) start getting sick and then you know plagues have no passports .

0
1

[–] Spacehuman 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

You are still clinging to bad logic when you assume weakness as their motivation.

E.g. You could say "Person Y wont have let a random drunk stinky winos sleep on his couch because he is to weak to deal with it".

or

"Person X wont have sex with horses because her vagina is to weak to deal with a big old horse penis".