You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
Meh, banning physical items is lame. People who are really brave ban behaviors. Shitty behaviors. Or at least hold extremist Muslims to the same account as everyone else. Very few people have the bravery, even among people who are brave enough to ban an item.
We and Morroco need the bravery to put a man in jail who tells a women not to go to a coffee shop instead of going tisk. We and morroco need the bravery to investigate if a muslim does something violent to investigate if his mosque or his imam has encouraged or incited violence and lock him up and shut down the mosque.
I'm for freedom of religion but this is the standard churches needed to follow from the founding and was the intent of the founders. They never expected freedom of religion to be an exception to any and all other laws. While in American past enforcement hasn't been inconsistent, it has always been the legal doctrine that a minister that incites violence or preaches it can be thrown in jail. If Muslims teach that the koran should be applied exactly as is than by incorporation by reference they are preaching speech that does not have a religious exception.
In other words, the fact that a person's speech is religious does not elevate it. The fact that it is religious means it can't be censored as such, not explicit banning of a religion, but the words carry the same responsibility as if they were not religious. Saying you should perform the acts suggested in a book which would be illegal is illegal.
Oh my gosh, you guys! Read the comments in the article, they're hilarious.
...next time you start your comment by insulting people, be prepared son of the whore tto handle to be insulted back. telling people not to liten to me, are you some sort of fucking messiah hasshole???
The summary would be: ... Whenever you so begin a comment with negative conjecture lambasting ones character, expect to have others defend themselves and consequently chastise you. You have no authority to tell others to ignore me, you son of a promiscuous woman. Who do you think you are? You self-righteous asshole.
Sort: Top
[–] collegetoker 1 point 6 points 7 points (+7|-1) ago
Good on you, Morocco.
[–] bikergang_accountant 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago (edited ago)
Meh, banning physical items is lame. People who are really brave ban behaviors. Shitty behaviors. Or at least hold extremist Muslims to the same account as everyone else. Very few people have the bravery, even among people who are brave enough to ban an item.
We and Morroco need the bravery to put a man in jail who tells a women not to go to a coffee shop instead of going tisk. We and morroco need the bravery to investigate if a muslim does something violent to investigate if his mosque or his imam has encouraged or incited violence and lock him up and shut down the mosque.
I'm for freedom of religion but this is the standard churches needed to follow from the founding and was the intent of the founders. They never expected freedom of religion to be an exception to any and all other laws. While in American past enforcement hasn't been inconsistent, it has always been the legal doctrine that a minister that incites violence or preaches it can be thrown in jail. If Muslims teach that the koran should be applied exactly as is than by incorporation by reference they are preaching speech that does not have a religious exception.
In other words, the fact that a person's speech is religious does not elevate it. The fact that it is religious means it can't be censored as such, not explicit banning of a religion, but the words carry the same responsibility as if they were not religious. Saying you should perform the acts suggested in a book which would be illegal is illegal.
[–] Shoahshekelmeister 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
And yet they continue to put in prison all those who leave the death-cult called islam...
[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
[–] Shoahshekelmeister 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Morocco#Freedom_of_religion ; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irreligion_in_Morocco " 220 article of the Moroccan penal code condemns up to 3 years in jail those who quit Islam"
[–] SunflowerSutra 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Oh my gosh, you guys! Read the comments in the article, they're hilarious.
[–] lord_nougat 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
My gibberish to english translator appears not to be functioning properly at the moment.
[–] bikergang_accountant 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Mines working fine.
He's saying that his complementary meal has upset his stomach on account of his ulcers. He's wondering if you might have an aspirin and some antacid.
[–] SunflowerSutra 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
"Son of a whore" is what had me giggling.
The summary would be: ... Whenever you so begin a comment with negative conjecture lambasting ones character, expect to have others defend themselves and consequently chastise you. You have no authority to tell others to ignore me, you son of a promiscuous woman. Who do you think you are? You self-righteous asshole.
[–] HeavyBrain 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
OP must be proud as fuck he is not only the son of a whore, but the son of THE whore.
[–] SunflowerSutra ago
Heh. While he is not the son of a promiscuous woman, I am proud. You're half right.
[–] harsoe 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
They can export to eurabia
[–] PhilaFerret 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4105244/Morocco-bans-production-sale-burqas-reports.html
The quoted article did not explain the reason for the ban.
[–] 7574291? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Islamists Gain Ground in Morocco Elections
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/09/07/islamists-gain-ground-in-morocco-elections/
Morocco's Islamists test gains in parliamentary election
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-morocco-election-idUSKCN1261FQ
some people want the true islam
[–] weezkitty 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Having Muslims in the country is a security risk. Period.
[–] 7575939? 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago (edited ago)
The burka ban is a symptom
Something much bigger we don't hear much about is going on in morocco IMO
[–] HeavyBrain ago
Burqa manufacturers dont give two shits as European Market is opening up.
[–] Artofchoke ago
I don't care about the why, it's progress. Civilized nations must stop tolerating slavery in their midst.
[–] fancyname 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
yes!
[–] Troll ago
Wait, what?
[–] 7575961? ago
Yep
As I've said above, it's a symptom, something's sinister is happening in the moroccan society / political landscape