2
34

[–] SirRender 2 points 34 points (+36|-2) ago 

Didn't wikileaks already confirm that Russia was not the source of the hacked e-mails in question? To me this seems like a backhanded way to try to get everyone to agree to a false premise (that Russia was the source of hacking) in order to undermine President-elect Trumps election. I've said it before and I'll say it again, both the CIA and FBI need to be investigating the content as it has proven quite accurate.

0
39

[–] ShinyVoater 0 points 39 points (+39|-0) ago 

The whole reason for the entire farce about it coming from Russia is to have the contents ignored. If they call it foreign meddling enough, people might just look at the scapegoat and completely ignore what they're actually being scapegoated for.

0
21

[–] LuminalAbnormality 0 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago 

I've seen people spout off that Russian influence is proof that wikileaks can't be trusted. They claim the wikileaks emails have been altered. Ridiculous.

0
8

[–] sweetholymosiah 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

You guys keep me sane.

0
0

[–] elgindelta 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Didn't obamanation declare a recount would have no precedence based on there being no evidence of tampering from outside sources?;? Gotta love barry, "outside" steering well away from voter fraud "in" the country. Doucheapotumus

7
0

[–] Broc_Lia 7 points 0 points (+7|-7) ago 

Didn't wikileaks already confirm that Russia was not the source of the hacked e-mails in question?

Well sure, but that can't really be taken as proof either.

o me this seems like a backhanded way to try to get everyone to agree to a false premise (that Russia was the source of hacking) in order to undermine President-elect Trumps election.

No shit

5
14

[–] U_is_stupidfuck 5 points 14 points (+19|-5) ago  (edited ago)

Well sure, but that can't really be taken as proof either.

Wrong. wrong. wrong. If you are going to say this, then you MUST provide an explanation as to how the DKIM was broken. This should be difficult even with a functional quantum computer.

The emails are DKIM verified. We have emails of them discussing INTERNAL leaks. They were concerned with this enough to alert their lawyers and begin prepping for fallout.

So it's not on wikileaks to prove anything. It's up to you to explain how this technology has been magically obsolete for ten years without anybody knowing.

This is most likely your Russian hacker.

https://s3.amazonaws.com/assets.forward.com/images/cropped/11703357-10205141241593525-3507719565342059491-o-1468335644.jpg

Edit: if you are fucking cucked or dumb enough to downvoat me then you had better be brave enough to give a rundown on that technology. Cowards.

0
21

[–] remedy4reality 0 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago 

Just what the hell is the CIA doing with all the money they receive?

They blew it 911. They blew it on WMD. They blew it on ISIS.

The CIA is far, far from trustworthy and competent.

0
11

[–] acesneights 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

The CIA has NEVER been trustworthy. Their services are not provided for the benefit and security of the American people.

0
3

[–] elgindelta 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

For example, ever wonder who and what is “behind”, let’s say, the CIA? Well, they don’t swear allegiance to America, that’s for certain. Try the British royal family.

0
1

[–] elgindelta 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

0
4

[–] xobodox 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

running drugs, guns, and propaganda for the ruling class.. duh!

1
4

[–] vacvape 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

Crack is a hell of a drug.

0
9

[–] remedy4reality 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

In the case of the CIA...

Crack is a hell of a business.

0
2

[–] ababcb 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

They are purchasing children to fuck with all the money they've got.

0
17

[–] Neocult 0 points 17 points (+17|-0) ago 

That is because it is complete and utter nonsense. The Jill Stein fronted recount failed, so now they are going back to the Russia narrative. Looking for any excuse other than blaming themselves and admitting that just maybe they lost the election because people did not want to vote for a corrupt, lying, criminal hag that was going continue the failed policies of the least 8 years even worse.

0
6

[–] HowieCameUnglued 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I didn't vote Trump because of Clinton. I didn't care for her and the leaks sure didn't help her cause -- but I voted for Trump because of Trump. He was the first mainstream politician in a while (in my lifetime of following politics, really) who came out and said what I believed in. Not all of it - there's a lot I disagree with him on - but enough that I felt that he was willing to challenge the established order of things and do what's right for me and my future family.

If anything, Clinton was the one who ran a very negative campaign. I can't think of a single policy she had other than "I'm not Trump". Sure, Trump attacked Clinton, but he also had a message of his own. What was Hillary's message again?

I'm sure there were people who voted Trump because he seemed the lesser of two evils, and the leaked emails only helped prove that point to them. But it's not like another mainstream Democrat (say Joe Biden) would've done any better, even without leaked emails. Trump won because he was Trump, not because be was not-Clinton and certainly not because of a few leaks.

The most interesting part of the leaked emails to me was how far the DNC went to disenfranchise Sanders supporters.

0
4

[–] jedininja 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

On top of Clinton being a criminal shit bag, I think the MSM helped Trump win by taking the tone they did with their audience. Telling them they are racist, sexist, xenophobes (lol nobody even knew what that words meant until MSM said it every other word) had the exact opposite effect than they tried for. Nobody wants to hear that over and over again, that shit got old and people realized that they didn't like being called racists and sexists 24/7.

0
1

[–] Al_Rubyx 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Yeah I voted for Obama both times. And voted trump over Hillary because Hillary was just that bad.

1
12

[–] BAppreciAting 1 points 12 points (+13|-1) ago 

Why are we not concerned that, while these are suspicions, that if international election meddling is an issue than who is more guilty than israel, let's start prosecuting the obvious and admitted perpetrators first?!$.

1
1

[–] ababcb 1 points 1 points (+2|-1) ago 

Let's hold them accountable for their WMD's while we're at it.

2
9

[–] Shoahshekelmeister 2 points 9 points (+11|-2) ago  (edited ago)

"conclusions about the Kremlin's motives for hacking Democratic Party emails during the 2016 race."

Funny how they state this as a fact, even though nobody ever presented a single evidence of this... More "fake news" by the (((medias)))

0
4

[–] Lemongarb 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I found this part interesting:

The bureau, true to its law enforcement roots, wants facts and tangible evidence to prove something beyond all reasonable doubt. The CIA is more comfortable drawing inferences from behavior.

0
1

[–] Shoahshekelmeister 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

That's because the FBI can be held accountable, and needs proof to do its job which is justice (in theory). The CIA is just a bunch of soulless assassins, drug dealers, thieves that answer to no one and are never held accountable, so they can do what they please and not give a fuck.

0
8

[–] 7173479 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

When pressed for evidence you won't find a single shred. This always happens and this is a systemic problem with the relation between the government and the media. The media never asks for evidence and just runs with the story.

Mind you this coming from the mouthpiece of Obama's WH who feels very insecure at the moment. Sad

0
7

[–] WotTheFook 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

If there are any 'sides' to this (in the hypothetical sense), it's not hard to see who is siding with whom in all of this, is it? I'm glad that the FBI have not come down on the same side as the CIA, as it means that the FBI remember who they actually work for.

0
0

[–] ababcb 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

There is definitely factionalism going on this election, with the FBI clearly on the Trump side and the CIA clearly behind the Clinton faction.

0
6

[–] Broc_Lia 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

So have they actually been confirmed to be CIA conclusions then?

0
0

[–] Pwning4Ever 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

No, it was a he said,she said type deal that WashPost took and ran with it.

0
0

[–] Broc_Lia 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

That's what I mean though, does this confirm that it's at least official CIA conclusions.

load more comments ▼ (15 remaining)