0
11

[–] Adminstrater 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

While the liberal students are being organized by the liberal groups on campus to protest Milo, the funds for security should come from the liberal groups' coffers, as they are the ones that are forcing the school to issue more security. That seems like a fair way to dole out the cost while at the same time, allowing free speech, and also free expression without incurring more fees at the expense of the opposite group.

0
5

[–] Black_Phillip 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Fair? They don't care about that.

I was at the Milo speech at DePaul. Those protesters were let in by the administration, you know how I know? The room was already at capacity but they came in anyway.

0
2

[–] Siedge 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Yeah or lets split the fees based on all parties involved. If you have 3 protesting groups organized and milos meeting setup. Split it 4 ways, (Although he shouldn't have to pay in my opinion) I'm not really sure though, I find the whole thing ridiculous really.

0
0

[–] lexsird 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

You don't understand, Iowa City is so liberal it's insane. I'm thinking it had socialists in the government there back before it was 'stylish' to. It's seriously batshit over the rainbow liberal. But on the other hand it does produce tons of medical care for the poor. lol. They'll drive across the state to come get your impoverished ass to treat you and give you medicine. Go figure.

But it's over the top liberal as fuck for Iowa even and Iowa can be weird about things. Some of it is super conservative but it has it's super freaks as well.

0
0

[–] Thin_White_Duke 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

This isn't even Iowa City, dude.

It's conservative Ames.

1
5

[–] voNIKONov 1 points 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

I fucking hate liberals.

1
3

[–] cointelpro_shill 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Shit tends to go down when Milo's in town, it's not their fault

public college or university administrators—may not lawfully impose security fees based on their own subjective judgments about “the amount of hostility likely to be created by the speech based on its content.”

It's not the speech, it's the Milo. He IS a dangerous faggot

0
1

[–] hypercat 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Can we rename what you call liberal to SJWs? I think the term liberal is being misused to label BLM, SJW, and other extreme left sects. Like with the Tea party. Can we do that?

0
1

[–] MCVoat 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

FREEMILO

4
-3

[–] Twisterz 4 points -3 points (+1|-4) ago 

Isn't Milo all about the free hand of the market? Isn't this just them voting against Milo with their dollar? BTW I'm with Milo on this point, but it's a little hypocritical for him to complain about them using economic instead of political pressure against him.

1
6

[–] Lord-Stokeworth 1 points 6 points (+7|-1) ago 

WTF? You are some stupid fag.

Imagine if Republicans used Alinky's rules against the left and started violently disrupting leftie speakers. Then those same exact Republicans demanded the leftie speakers cough up funds to provide for security because those leftie speakers cause higher security costs. If you think that qualifies as "economic pressure" you are delusional beyond belief.

Actually, if you think that's "economic pressure" shouldn't the KKK start fucking up every public event Democrats hold? By your logic the Democrats would then be responsible for all of the increased security costs. Does that make sense to you? Because that is exactly where your retarded logic lands you.