You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] Eyevory ago 

Regarding the real estate issue, there are several issues with the idea of a fair tax though. I read recently that the average homeowner stays in their home only about 5-7 years before selling and buying something else. Is the consumption tax on real estate somehow pro-rated so a purchaser doesn't have to pay the full taxable amount each and every time they buy a new home even if they just sold their old home? If not, do you really think people will want to buy new homes? If I knew I had to pay 15% tax on a new home I doubt I would be as willing to move because that is a huge loss. Imagine paying $30,000 tax on a $200,000 home and four years later wanting to move into a $300,000 home.... that isn't realistic because the burden of paying the taxes would impact equity to the point many purchasers wouldn't have the necessary funds for a down payment. Anyone who bought and sold within a few years would essentially be taking a huge financial hit. Then there is the question about whether real estate is only taxable after the first purchase, or during each subsequent purchase? If products are taxed more than once, it again offers and incentive to keep what you have and not buy new which hurts the economy.

Also, regarding property taxes, it is important to realize there are benefits to collecting property taxes annually. First, if there is no annual cost to property, people may allow a property to go into disrepair and just ignore it because it doesn't cost anything to them. If they have an empty lot or a few acres they might just sit on the land while development occurs around them which leads to urban sprawl. At least when people pay taxes on their property they have some skin in the game and if they aren't utilizing the property or see a benefit to retaining it, they are more willing to sell it to someone who will.

Also, many local school districts and fire departments get their funding from property taxes. If you take that funding away their budgets would be reliant upon whatever portion of the fair tax / consumption tax they receive. This is fine when things are going well, but if your economy tanks and people stop buying things... where do the schools and fire departments get their revenue? There are a lot of flaws and a lot of unanswered questions.

The Fair Tax proponents claim it is so much simpler, but it took them two books to explain the system and even then there are a lot of gaps and unanswered questions that remain. So I really don't think it is any better than a simplified progressive income tax system if we could just eliminate some of the loopholes and deductions. That said I agree something should be done because clearly what we have now doesn't work well for most Americans. There is always room for improvement, but until we start electing leaders that actually represent us instead of their own self interests I doubt this will change.