You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
That's great if they are. What OP can do in that case is come back and say that wikileaks has proof of conspiracy theory x, and actually link it to wikileaks' proof.
This is the tenth fucking time today that I see a headline saying that wikileaks has proof of child trafficking in the Clinton Foundation. I click on the link, and it's just some dumbass with a blog posting his reaction to screencaps from /pol/ that were taken a year ago. Nothing has come of it yet. 4 chan is not a reputable news source. They are often news makers, but there are also many trolls and anarchists on the site.
Probably CTR shills in panic mode trying to discredit Wikileaks. "Hey, lets spout a bunch of crazy shit, attribute it to Wikileaks, but link to some nutbag blogs or conspiracy sites. Nobody will trust them and we'll save our jobs!"
view the rest of the comments →
[–] oedipusaurus_rex 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
That's great if they are. What OP can do in that case is come back and say that wikileaks has proof of conspiracy theory x, and actually link it to wikileaks' proof.
This is the tenth fucking time today that I see a headline saying that wikileaks has proof of child trafficking in the Clinton Foundation. I click on the link, and it's just some dumbass with a blog posting his reaction to screencaps from /pol/ that were taken a year ago. Nothing has come of it yet. 4 chan is not a reputable news source. They are often news makers, but there are also many trolls and anarchists on the site.
[–] uvulectomy ago
Probably CTR shills in panic mode trying to discredit Wikileaks. "Hey, lets spout a bunch of crazy shit, attribute it to Wikileaks, but link to some nutbag blogs or conspiracy sites. Nobody will trust them and we'll save our jobs!"