You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
10

[–] Baconmon 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

This is one thing the MSM has a really hard time trying to cover up and explain.. They (MSM and CTR) try to tell you "rally support doesn't necessarily correlate with voter turn-out".. The reality is: To some degree, yes it does..

Do some critical thinking here:
hillary's pathetic rallies have like 200-300 people typically..
Trump rallies have like 15,000-35,000..
While it is true that SOME people might go to a rally, but end up not voting, what are the chances that tons of those enthusiastic Trump voters would suddenly wake up on election day and lose enough motivation in Trump to decide not to go and vote?.. That chances are very tiny..
Likewise, they also expect us to believe that even though no one but crickets and ghosts showed up at hillary's rallies, suddenly on election day ENORMOUS swaths of the population suddenly get the motivation to go vote for hillary even though they didn't have any motivation to visit her rally in their local city/town..

Don't let them brainwash you on the rally points.. While a little discrepancy is normal, the BIGGER the discrepancy is between rally turnout and voter turnout, the BIGGER chance that it is bullshit.. And for hillary to "win" this election, the discrepancy has to be YUGE..

3
0

[–] Shoggoth 3 points 0 points (+3|-3) ago  (edited ago)

Likewise, they also expect us to believe that even though no one but crickets and ghosts showed up at hillary's rallies, suddenly on election day ENORMOUS swaths of the population suddenly get the motivation to go vote for hillary even though they didn't have any motivation to visit her rally in their local city/town..

You act as though if someone doesn't show up at a rally it's safe to assume they won't vote. A vast majority of voters do not attend rallies.