You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
[–]Baconmon0 points
10 points
10 points
(+10|-0)
ago
This is one thing the MSM has a really hard time trying to cover up and explain.. They (MSM and CTR) try to tell you "rally support doesn't necessarily correlate with voter turn-out".. The reality is: To some degree, yes it does..
Do some critical thinking here:
hillary's pathetic rallies have like 200-300 people typically..
Trump rallies have like 15,000-35,000..
While it is true that SOME people might go to a rally, but end up not voting, what are the chances that tons of those enthusiastic Trump voters would suddenly wake up on election day and lose enough motivation in Trump to decide not to go and vote?.. That chances are very tiny..
Likewise, they also expect us to believe that even though no one but crickets and ghosts showed up at hillary's rallies, suddenly on election day ENORMOUS swaths of the population suddenly get the motivation to go vote for hillary even though they didn't have any motivation to visit her rally in their local city/town..
Don't let them brainwash you on the rally points.. While a little discrepancy is normal, the BIGGER the discrepancy is between rally turnout and voter turnout, the BIGGER chance that it is bullshit.. And for hillary to "win" this election, the discrepancy has to be YUGE..
[+]Shoggoth3 points0 points3 points
ago
(edited ago)
[–]Shoggoth3 points
0 points
3 points
(+3|-3)
ago
(edited ago)
Likewise, they also expect us to believe that even though no one but crickets and ghosts showed up at hillary's rallies, suddenly on election day ENORMOUS swaths of the population suddenly get the motivation to go vote for hillary even though they didn't have any motivation to visit her rally in their local city/town..
You act as though if someone doesn't show up at a rally it's safe to assume they won't vote. A vast majority of voters do not attend rallies.
[–]Kal0 points
1 point
1 point
(+1|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
The mental gymnastics voaters have done from when we were saying the same thing about Bernie crowds vs Hillary's is fun to watch. Oh, NOW it matters? After the election is stolen is that going to matter more than having the primary stolen from Bernie somehow? You fucking tools.
Polls in favour of Hillary will convince lazy and apathetic Hillary supporters not to bother to remember to vote, so I am not sure what the purpose of the liberal media pushing a hillary lead causes except momentary bragging rights.
Sort: Top
[–] Baconmon 0 points 10 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago
This is one thing the MSM has a really hard time trying to cover up and explain.. They (MSM and CTR) try to tell you "rally support doesn't necessarily correlate with voter turn-out".. The reality is: To some degree, yes it does..
Do some critical thinking here:
hillary's pathetic rallies have like 200-300 people typically..
Trump rallies have like 15,000-35,000..
While it is true that SOME people might go to a rally, but end up not voting, what are the chances that tons of those enthusiastic Trump voters would suddenly wake up on election day and lose enough motivation in Trump to decide not to go and vote?.. That chances are very tiny..
Likewise, they also expect us to believe that even though no one but crickets and ghosts showed up at hillary's rallies, suddenly on election day ENORMOUS swaths of the population suddenly get the motivation to go vote for hillary even though they didn't have any motivation to visit her rally in their local city/town..
Don't let them brainwash you on the rally points.. While a little discrepancy is normal, the BIGGER the discrepancy is between rally turnout and voter turnout, the BIGGER chance that it is bullshit.. And for hillary to "win" this election, the discrepancy has to be YUGE..
[–] Shoggoth 3 points 0 points 3 points (+3|-3) ago (edited ago)
You act as though if someone doesn't show up at a rally it's safe to assume they won't vote. A vast majority of voters do not attend rallies.
[–] [deleted] 3 points 7 points 10 points (+10|-3) ago
[–] bonesmccoy 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
They sure have and I'm done seeing my GenX getting screwed by Boomer politicians.
[–] kurfu ago
You can't blame an entire generation for the sins of their leaders.
[–] 6657745? 3 points -1 points 2 points (+2|-3) ago
Thats a statement with zero evidence. If you look down generational lines, it's surprisingly close between the two candidates.
[–] 6657548? 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Democrat oversampling to give her an advantage in the polls so when she commits voter fraud it's harder to see. They also over sample women.
[–] Diogenes_The_Cynic 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
A friend of mine went to see if there really was a disparity. He visited both candidates party stops here in SD. The group for Trump was way bigger.
[–] gosso920 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Dead people don't attend rallies.
[–] Kal 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
The mental gymnastics voaters have done from when we were saying the same thing about Bernie crowds vs Hillary's is fun to watch. Oh, NOW it matters? After the election is stolen is that going to matter more than having the primary stolen from Bernie somehow? You fucking tools.
[–] Adminstrater 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Polls in favour of Hillary will convince lazy and apathetic Hillary supporters not to bother to remember to vote, so I am not sure what the purpose of the liberal media pushing a hillary lead causes except momentary bragging rights.
[–] MONKEYBUSINESS 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Google is shady as fuck when you search for this. Examples: Trump rally "empty" http://i.imgur.com/9gvX0Z2.png Trump rally "violent" http://i.imgur.com/5tok5a3.png Reality: http://i.imgur.com/z7WDpuN.jpg http://i.imgur.com/iXx3kbP.jpg http://i.imgur.com/0awoYQ0.jpg http://i.imgur.com/SEpLd52.jpg