You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →


[–] swfreak 0 points 40 points (+40|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I agree. There's no such thing as Hillary being finished. Voters aren't rational actors and they're not moved by facts and evidence.

If they were we wouldn't be in the trouble we find ourself in as a civilization, and I would have a lot more faith in the future than I have right now.

Don't underestimate the possibility of Hillary being elected president!

Hillary has the greatest support from low IQ groups (blacks, hispanics) and from groups that are more easily moved by emotions (women). Do you think they care about Wikileaks and all the technicalities around how Hillary used her influence as a politician to enrich herself?

I hear super smart people like Scott Adams say the election is over. Isn't it incredibly dangerous to take anything for granted here?

Not to mention the possibility of a grand election fraud that could push the election in Clinton's favor. A lot of illegal immigrants could vote more than one time. Voting machines could be rigged. Election officals could play with the numbers before reporting them. There's no concrete paper trail as far as I know.

If someone smarter than me could explain to me why they're so confident that Trump will win please help me understand.


[–] Gamio 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

Unfortunately this is the real issue with politics around the world. The few who know enough to cast educated votes are so few and far between that it really has to be a gigantic unmissable and irrefutable scandal in the media 24/7 or the incompetent masses roll in on poling day and vote without really knowing who or what they are voting for.

For Hilary to be completely beyond ever winning an election there would have to be open and passionate decent within the Democratic party and thats just not going to happen, theres more passion in a used tissue on the floor of a wank booth in Amsterdam than there is in the entire established American political system.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 



[–] aria_taint 1 points 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

This is above the low IQ retards we call Democrat voters, this goes much further up the chain to Congress to have her and the rest of the Dems involved in her pay to play tossed in jail.


[–] heygeorge 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I think you are deluding yourself to think all dem voters are low IQ. It's a sad feature of Voat to ascribe this as fact (that I should perhaps leave alone) but for some reason I think more of the people on this site to label a gigantic mass of people under a single attribute.


[–] Hey_Sunshine 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

fuck em all


[–] EatingSteak 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Professors and other top people in academia, who have among the highest IQ of any 'groups', are overwhelmingly liberal.

The south(eastern) US is full of impoverished, low-IQ morons that vote almost exclusively Republican.

Wherever you're getting this "democrat = low IQ" assertion from,do yourself a favor and fact-check it


[–] Mut 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Because you don't need a majority of people to vote for you. You don't even need a majority of voters to vote for you[although its certainly a big plus]. You only need to win enough states by the slimmest majority.

Hispanics hardly vote at all, Blacks vote a little more but not as much as whites. Young people don't vote.Uneducated people dont vote. It doesn't matter too much if these demographics disfavour you.

You know who votes? Old people. White men. Conservatives. The educated*.

What camp do these people overwhelmingly prefer? Republican.

I am concerned about electoral fraud, thats one that's hard to slant. Let's just hope that Trump has paid more to the guys who rig the voting machines than the Democrats and all will be well.


[–] heili 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

There's no concrete paper trail as far as I know.

There isn't one at all.