0
57

[–] Apathy 0 points 57 points (+57|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Meanwhile little girls are getting gang raped by muzzies and nobody's arresting them because that would be racist.

"Incidents against women that are motivated by an attitude of a man towards a woman and includes behaviour targeted towards a woman by men simply because they are a woman."

Worst definition in the world. By this definition, I'm a misogynist for simply asking a girl out, flirting with her, or holding a door open for her (I actually hold doors open for everyone, but you get the idea).

0
22

[–] Adminstrater 0 points 22 points (+22|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I like the wording of that quote. It reminds me that: Women can't be misogynist, just like blacks can't be racist.

0
8

[–] downton-stabby 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

I think it's initial steps against banning Whitey from touching women and will have 0 impact on blacks / browns.

0
5

[–] fagnig 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

0
4

[–] fuck_communism 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Women can't be misogynist

Every woman I've ever known hates other women. The vast majority of them feminists are also misandrist.

0
4

[–] tibstibs 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I actually hold doors open for everyone

Whoa, you too? Seems like a dying custom, unfortunately.

0
2

[–] hatchrawerberyl 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I do, was trained well by the Boy Scouts

0
3

[–] Voluptuous_Panda 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

0
30

[–] Empire_of_the_mind 0 points 30 points (+30|-0) ago 

Hating men, of course, will continue to be fine.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
12

[–] fagnig 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

The way 'progressives' are able to force their narrative

...is by classifying mens rights as a hate movement.

0
0

[–] Empire_of_the_mind 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

nah, I'm a man.

0
1

[–] Mr_Quagmire 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

0
2

[–] Empire_of_the_mind 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

she won't be PM for long

0
17

[–] TelescopiumHerscheli [S] 0 points 17 points (+17|-0) ago  (edited ago)

... though you can be damn sure they won't be doing the same for those man-hating feminists.

1
-1

[–] antiracist 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Since the "axioms" and "definitions" are highly debatable

Why? What if I said that the infinitude of primes was highly debatable because of the definition of prime? That's not really informative.

some rather questionable "Axioms" and "Definitions", notably (at first sight) Axiom 5.

Axiom 5 says: "Necessary existence is a positive property".

Why is this questionable?

A quick scan of the article suggests that there are problems with the definition of "positive property"

What problems?

and with the usual questions around existence as a predicate;

I didn't see this raised in the Wikipedia article. The relevant predicate is necessary existence, not existence.

0
15

[–] AOU 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago 

The United Kaliphate of Eurabia.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
4

[–] borislav 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Really think that british police who allows muslims to rape white children on an industrial scale would defend white cishet males?

[–] [deleted] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
5

[–] bob3333 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

And misandry?

0
5

[–] HeavyBrain 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Thank god I identify as a woman.

0
1

[–] YodaDankfish 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

Lol what a trump card.

0
3

[–] TauCeti 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Oh, wonderful. Now criticizing anything a feminist says could end with you before a judge. What the hell is wrong with society? Why do the police kowtow to this bullshit??

load more comments ▼ (7 remaining)