You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

17
-15

[–] HeavyBrain 17 points -15 points (+2|-17) ago 

No because its the same god christans and Jews (amin releigions) talk about so technically its correct.

1
14

[–] Rellik88 1 points 14 points (+15|-1) ago 

Except the problem is Islamic terror so this kinda undermines that.

3
0

[–] HeavyBrain 3 points 0 points (+3|-3) ago 

Thats the plan.

0
5

[–] Rakosman 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

To me, asserting that because it refers to the same being, the words are interchangeable is the wrong stance. In a way, it disrespects the intent of the word which, in this case, would be specifically referring to the Islamic god. Which is why you have legal rulings about it. However, the consequence of that source is that it demonstrates that Arabic Christians also use the word Allah.

Of course, when there's a narrative to push ethics and intent become irrelevant.

0
0

[–] the-gerbil-in-my-bum 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

perhaps referring to the judeo-christian god by its actual name instead of referring to it by title would remove some confusion(that will no doubt increase as cuckrulers continue importing sandniggers)

Jehovah/Yahweh is clearly not mohammads family idol.

2
-1

[–] the-gerbil-in-my-bum 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago  (edited ago)

false, Allah is but a simple moon idol owned by mohammads family out of hundreds that existed in medina that he based his mockery of the jewish religion off of; its all proudly stated in mohammads biography

0
0

[–] HeavyBrain 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Maybe, I never really felt like paying that much attention to a book writen by a pschotic pedophile who lived 1000 years ago.