4
55

[–] novictim 4 points 55 points (+59|-4) ago  (edited ago)

And why has SALON lost their moral moorings on this topic of pedophilia at this time in its history?

ISLAM.

You cannot reconcile the misogynist and pedophile culture of Islam with tolerance of Islam without first rewriting our moral code to become more accepting of child rape and the desire for child rape.

And it will not stop with this topic. Everything that Islam supports including medieval dress codes for women, insisting on Women requiring men as chaperones, the denial of Women's rights to work will all find their way into the Orwellian agenda of New Thought.

Even the notion of Democracy, something that Islam soundly rejects as blasphemy as it relies on man and not Allah, will find its precepts undermined in subtle ways as the apologists for Islam seek to supplant Western Enlightenment values with Islamic values.

Why are they doing this? I'm sure that the staff at Salon are not even sure. They may give some self hating tripe about "Colonialism" or "Slavery" or "cultural Imperialism" and the need to be tolerant (of intolerant Islam) but it will all come down to a sense of self hate and self loathing and a desire to "burn it all down". So why not celebrate Islam and its acceptance of marrying off 6year old girls against their will to old men? It is so "radical" that it must be "good", right, Salon?

21
-14

0
43

[–] Womb_Raider 0 points 43 points (+43|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Fucking gross.

Nickerson also claimed that children like pedophiles and desire to be around them, and that the 5-year-old girl he was babysitting once “came onto” him.

No, children like people, and do whatever brings them attention.

Mentally ill. Ignorant of the world. Ignorant of humanity.

6
0

[–] mamwad 6 points 0 points (+6|-6) ago 

If you read Nickerson's article, he admits that he fell into the pro-contact internet crowd and parroted their talking points before he joined a no-contact forum. So, he publicly admits that what he said back in 2006 (when that quote was written) is wrong, ignorant, and mentally ill. Those aren't the views that he is espousing today.

0
19

[–] icamefromreddityo 0 points 19 points (+19|-0) ago 

And we give a shit, why? You don't just "fall" into forums, and changing your tune once you become well known in the media is to be expected. He's being paid to lie.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
2

[–] HeavyBrain 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Didnt you hear him, its not him, the children comming on to him.

0
20

[–] TheDude2 [S] 0 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago 

This is a sick joke or a made up story, right?

[–] [deleted] 2 points 6 points (+8|-2) ago 

[Deleted]

0
7

[–] 1moar 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

And bullets are cheap.

2
5

[–] ourgalfriday 2 points 5 points (+7|-2) ago 

How is this guy still alive? He lives in a small town in Tennessee. His predilictions are known. Rednecks, I am disappoint.

0
4

[–] pauly_pants 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

They're not the socially conservative murder barbarians you've been led to believe they are.

0
19

[–] Cthulu 0 points 19 points (+19|-0) ago 

They're doing this because social justice needs new "victims" that are reviled by society. Society doesn't hate gays and trannies enough any more, or at least, not as much as SJW's need them to. Most people don't really give a shit whether someone wants to pretend to be the opposite sex or bang members of the same sex. Whenever something becomes mainstream, it loses its victim status, and thus SJW's lose interest in it.

But one thing everyone hates are pedos. So that's the next area that SocJus needs to move into. They'll now shame everyone for hating pedophiles and consider themselves morally superior for being tolerant of them.

0
5

[–] mznxbcv 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

That's actually a really good insight. I hadn't quite looked at it like that. (no sarcasm)

0
3

[–] thuvia_1 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

then they can shame me. there is no place in the world for people who will sexually victimize children.

0
0

[–] HeavyBrain 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Whenever something becomes mainstream in the west, it loses its victim status, and thus SJW's lose interest in it.

FTFY

1
10

[–] Sev_ 1 points 10 points (+11|-1) ago 

If a pedophile wants to declare to the world he's a pedophile, and wants to explain his mindset, I don't have a problem with it. These people are obviously sick, and knowing how their disease works can help the medical community to treat them. If you need a "safe space" from hearing someone describe how their brain works, or want to censor what amounts to nothing more than speech, then you're mentally weak.

There is a distinct difference between what I describe above, and pushing for tolerance and acceptance of pedophilia and the acts involved in it. Someone who has these kinds of thoughts should be required to seek treatment, as you would want someone with suicidal or homicidal thoughts to. Someone who commits acts of pedophilia should be punished under the law. People who condone untreated, unrepentant pedophiles are just as guilty as the pedophiles themselves.

0
4

[–] TheDude2 [S] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I don't disagree, but the way it is presented doesn't feel like it matches that sentiment.

0
3

[–] Sev_ 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

No, it doesn't. Salon went well out of bounds and decided to repeatedly support (financially - I assume they paid him, and morally - by allowing him to preach for acceptance and tolerance from their pulpit), an unrepentant, untreated pedophile. By not making treatment for his disease a condition on which he is granted a platform to speak, they put themselves on the hook for his actions.

This is no different than a reporter embedding themselves with a terrorist group for a story about making suicide bombs, and doing nothing to disrupt the attack they had planned.

0
0

[–] somethingissmarmy 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

if you go down the road of medicating people you deem as mentally sick, I wish you luck.

0
0

[–] Avenelle 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

I feel like a treatment for pedophilia wouldn't be all that different from other atypical sexual behaviors, ie: homosexuality/body dysmorphia. Obviously they aren't in the "same league," but we shouldn't be discouraged from research just because we accept any of these issues as "normal."

3
5

[–] MakeNoERROR 3 points 5 points (+8|-3) ago 

Absolutely disgusting.

1
4

[–] ratsmack 1 points 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

With the 10 down votes on this submission, I can only guess there must be 10 pedo's or perv's or a combination thereof lurking here.

load more comments ▼ (25 remaining)