You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
2

[–] larebil [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

So you think in this case it's fine that 9 month old content is above all new content? On reddit, the way it works is that new content appears not at the top, but maybe 3-4 places down (for less active subs, like /r/denmark). So at least people would notice the content, and be able to choose whether to up/downvote it. I think this is fine. New content shouldn't appear in #1 spot, but at least toward the top. However in this specific case, I think all new concent should appear above 9 month old content.

[–] [deleted] ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] larebil [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Your examples are quite extreme, and using extreme examples to prove a point is faulty logic. Use an average example, like the one in my original post.