Archived Is there a problem with the way new content is ranked, on voat ? (ideasforvoat)
submitted ago by larebil
Posted by: larebil
Posting time: 5.5 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 2/12/2017 1:51:00 AM
Views: 672
SCP: 23
23 upvotes, 0 downvotes (100% upvoted it)
Archived Is there a problem with the way new content is ranked, on voat ? (ideasforvoat)
submitted ago by larebil
view the rest of the comments →
[–] larebil [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
So you think in this case it's fine that 9 month old content is above all new content? On reddit, the way it works is that new content appears not at the top, but maybe 3-4 places down (for less active subs, like /r/denmark). So at least people would notice the content, and be able to choose whether to up/downvote it. I think this is fine. New content shouldn't appear in #1 spot, but at least toward the top. However in this specific case, I think all new concent should appear above 9 month old content.
[–] [deleted] ago
[–] larebil [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Your examples are quite extreme, and using extreme examples to prove a point is faulty logic. Use an average example, like the one in my original post.